Skip to Main Content
-
Predicting small-diameter loblolly pine aboveground biomass in naturally regenerated stands
Author(s): Kristin M. McElligott; Don C. Bragg; Jamie L. Schuler
Date: 2015
Source: In: Holley, A. Gordon; Connor, Kristina F.; Haywood, James D., eds. Proceedings of the 17th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e–Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–203. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: 326-331
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (348.0 KB)Note: This article is part of a larger document. View the larger documentDescription
There is growing interest in managing southern pine forests for both carbon sequestration and bioenergy. For instance, thinning otherwise unmerchantable trees in naturally regenerated pine-dominated forests should generate biomass without conflicting with more traditional forest products. However, we lack the tools to accurately quantify the biomass in these submerchantable size classes. To help remedy this, we destructively sampled 54 small-diameter loblolly pines (Pinus taeda L.) from stands on the Crossett Experimental Forest (CEF) in southeastern Arkansas. After harvesting, each tree was divided into stemwood, foliage and branch, and taproot components, then oven-dried and weighed. We then fit an exponential equation based on the National Biomass Estimator (NBE) to predict aboveground oven-dry biomass as a function of diameter at breast height (d.b.h.). The resulting model fit the sample data well (pseudo-R2 = 0.996). Comparing the CEF local biomass model with the pine submodel of the NBE suggested that the NBE would consistently underestimate small-diameter loblolly pine biomass on the CEF. While this difference appeared small, its cumulative effect could be appreciable. For example, in a young loblolly pine stand averaging 5 cm d.b.h. and 5,000 stems ha-1, the NBE would predict almost 9 percent less biomass than the new CEF biomass model—a difference of nearly 2 metric tons ha-1. Such locally derived equations offer silviculturists opportunities to better assess the potential of naturally regenerated pine stands to produce fiber and thus may be worth the investment of time and resources to develop.Publication Notes
- You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
Citation
McElligott, Kristin M.; Bragg, Don C.; Schuler, Jamie L. 2015. Predicting small-diameter loblolly pine aboveground biomass in naturally regenerated stands. In: Holley, A. Gordon; Connor, Kristina F.; Haywood, James D., eds. Proceedings of the 17th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e–Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–203. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: 326-331.Keywords
loblolly pine, biomass, Arkansas, Pinus taedaRelated Search
- Comparing aboveground biomass predictions for an uneven-aged pine-dominated stand using local, regional, and national models
- Biomass estimates of small diameter planted and natural-origin loblolly pines show major departures from the National Biomass Estimator equations
- Overstory species composition, structure, and conservation challenges of a mature, natural-origin pine stand after decades of management
XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/47630







