Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Housen Chu; Johan F. Gottgens; Jiquan Chen; Ge Sun; Ankur R. Desai; Zutao Ouyang; Changliang Shao; Kevin Czajkowski
    Date: 2015
    Source: Global Change Biology 21, 1165–1181
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Southern Research Station
    PDF: View PDF  (872 KB)


    Freshwater marshes are well-known for their ecological functions in carbon sequestration, but complete carbon budgets that include both methane (CH4) and lateral carbon fluxes for these ecosystems are rarely available. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first full carbon balance for a freshwater marsh where vertical gaseous [carbon dioxide (CO2) and CH4] and lateral hydrologic fluxes (dissolved and particulate organic carbon) have been simultaneously measured for multiple years (2011–2013). Carbon accumulation in the sediments suggested that the marsh was a long-term carbon sink and accumulated ~96.9  10.3 (95% CI) g C m 2 yr 1 during the last ~50 years. However, abnormal climate conditions in the last 3 years turned the marsh to a source of carbon (42.7  23.4 g C m 2 yr 1). Gross ecosystem production and ecosystem respiration were the two largest fluxes in the annual carbon budget. Yet, these two fluxes compensated each other to a large extent and led to the marsh being a CO2 sink in 2011 (78.8  33.6 g C m 2 yr 1), near CO2-neutral in 2012 (29.7  37.2 g C m 2 yr 1), and a CO2 source in 2013 (92.9  28.0 g C m 2 yr 1). The CH4 emission was consistently high with a three-year average of 50.8  1.0 g C m 2 yr 1. Considerable hydrologic carbon flowed laterally both into and out of the marsh (108.3  5.4 and 86.2  10.5 g C m 2 yr 1, respectively). In total, hydrologic carbon fluxes contributed ~23  13 g C m 2 yr 1 to the three-year carbon budget. Our findings highlight the importance of lateral hydrologic inflows/outflows in wetland carbon budgets, especially in those characterized by a flow-through hydrologic regime. In addition, different carbon fluxes responded unequally to climate variability/anomalies and, thus, the total carbon budgets may vary drastically among years.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Chu, Housen; Gottgens, Johan F.; Chen, Jiquan; Sun, Ge; Desai, Ankur R.; Ouyang, Zutao; Shao, Changliang; Czajkowski, Kevin 2015. Climatic variability, hydrologic anomaly, and methane emission can turn productive freshwater marshes into net carbon sources. Global Change Biology 21, 1165–1181. 17 p.


    Google Scholar


    carbon budget, carbon dioxide, carbon sequestration, dissolved organic carbon, eddy-covariance, methane, particulate organic carbon

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page