Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): William A. Lakel; Wallace Aust; C. Andrew Dolloff; Patrick D. Keyser
    Date: 2015
    Source: Forest Science
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Southern Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (180.03 KB)


    Forested streamside management zones (SMZs) provide numerous societal benefits including protection of water quality and enhancement of in-stream and riparian habitats. However, values of residual timber in SMZs are often ignored, yet maintenance of unnecessarily wide SMZs can potentially reduce merchantable timber. Therefore, forestland owners, managers, and logging contractors are interested in determining minimum SMZ widths and stocking levels that can effectively maintain water quality while minimizing residual SMZ stand values. A larger SMZ efficacy study evaluated the efficacy of 7.6-m SMZs with no thinning, 15.2-m SMZs with no thinning, 15.2-m SMZs with thinning, and 30.2-m SMZs without thinning within 16 operational clearcuts. All SMZs widths provided effective sediment control (Lakel et al. 2010). The substudy presented here evaluated residual values in the SMZs of the larger study. Analyses examined immediate values associated with foregoing removal of SMZ timber and provide insight into future SMZ management issues. Across 16 harvested tracts, SMZs accounted for approximately 12% of the total harvest area with an average SMZ residual timber value of $1,064.78/ha. This study supports the financial benefits of partial harvests within the SMZs that remove higher value trees as typically recommended or permitted by best management practice guidelines. However, partial harvests may promote less valuable shade-tolerant species. Results also indicated that almost one-half of the SMZs had notable wind and/or ice damage within 2 years of installation. Financial analysis including opportunities for a tax credit indicate that longer term management of SMZs may be financially feasible if valuable products continue to be thinned from these stands along with rotational harvesting of the adjacent upland stands. Overall, results indicate that society and landowner short-term goals for typical southern Piedmont sites can generally be achieved by leaving 15.2-m SMZs and thinning the stands where practical.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Lakel, William A., III; Aust, Wallace, M.; Dolloff, C. Andrew; Keyser, Patrick D. 2015. Residual timber values within Piedmont streamside management zones of different widths and harvest levels. Forest Science. 60


    Google Scholar


    best management practices, riparian forests, streamside management zone costs

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page