Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Robert Lücking; Mark K. Johnston; Andre Aptroot; Ekaphan Kraichak; James C. Lendemer; Kansri Boonpragob; Marcela E.S. Caceres; Damien Ertz; Lidia Itati Ferraro; Ze Feng Jia; Klaus Kalb; Armin Mangold; Leka Manoch; Joel A. Mercado-Diaz; Bibiana Moncada; Pachara Mongkolsuk; Khwanruan Butsatorn Papong; Sittiporn Parnmen; Rouchi N. Pelaez; Vasun Poengsungnoen; Eimy Rivas Plata; Wanaruk Saipunkaew; Harrie J.M. Sipman; Jutarat Sutjaritturakan; Dries Van Den Broeck; Matt von Konrat; Gothamie Weerakoon; H. Thorsten Lumbsch
    Date: 2014
    Source: Phytotaxa. 189(1):7-38.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    PDF: Download Publication  (3.03 MB)


    Recent studies of the global diversity of the lichenized fungal family Graphidaceae suggest that there are a large number of species remaining to be discovered. No less than 640 species have been described since 2002, including 175 new species introduced in a collaborative global effort in a single issue in this journal. These findings suggest that the largest family of tropical crustose lichens may have an even higher number of species than Parmeliaceae. To estimate whether conserved tropical rain forest; (3) not well-studied but with increasing amount of molecular data becoming available; and (4) global identification tools becoming available, such as the interactive key to thelotremoid taxa including tribe Ocellularieae assembled by Gaswick & Lücking (2012) and a global key for species in the genus Fissurina (Lücking, in prep.). This contrasts with the comparatively low proportion of new species in the large genera Graphis, Phaeographis, and Thelotrema. Both Graphis and Thelotrema are mostly found in (semi-)exposed situations in montane regions, and for both genera, global identification tools have been available for a few years already. This could suggest that the rate of species discoveries in these genera is decreasing and the bulk of new species have been discovered in the past few years. The low number of new species in Phaeographis, on the other hand, is apparently due to the lack of reliable nomenclatural and taxonomic resources in this group, which makes formal new species descriptions difficult. We therefore predict that the majority of undiscovered species belong to the genera Fissurina, Ocellularia, and Phaeographis and their relatives, in particular Myriotrema, Rhabdodiscus, Sacrographa, and Stegobolus. Some of these species might not be genuinely new but correspond to names in historical publications that had been subsumed into synonymy or never revised after their original descriptions. Geographically, our findings suggests that most of this unknown diversity is to be discovered in Mexico, the Andean countries from Venezuela down to Bolivia, the eastern Amazon, most of tropical West Africa, parts of continental southeast Asia (in particular China and adjacent areas to the southwest, such as Myanmar), and Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. Considering that substantial efforts in the past decade to catalogue the diversity of Graphidaceae have concentrated on a few regions only (southeastern North America, Costa Rica, the western Amazon, small parts of tropical Africa, India, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Australia, New Caledonia), and these efforts have unearthed over 600 new species, finding an additional 1,850 new species in the vast area covered by the aforementioned "discovery hotspot" regions seems not out of the ordinary. If we assume a similar-sized global task force and a continued collaborative effort as currently available, 600 species described in ten years translates to about 30 years required to describe an additional 1,850 species. However, this is only possible if there is continued substantial support for fieldwork, taxonomic work, and molecular work at a global scale, which will require increased efforts of taxonomists to explain the importance of this fundamental research for our understanding of the diversity of the globe to the public and funding agencies.

    Publication Notes

    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Lucking, Robert; Johnston, Mark K.; Aptroot, Andre; Kraichak, Ekaphan; Lendemer, James C.; Boonpragob, Kansri; Caceres, Marcela E.S.; Ertz, Damien; Itati Ferraro, Lidia; Jia, Ze Feng; Kalb, Klaus; Mangold, Armin; Manoch, Leka; Mercado-Diaz, Joel A.; Moncada, Bibiana; Mongkolsuk, Pachara; Butsatorn Papong, Khwanruan; Parnmen, Sittiporn; Pelaez, Rouchi N.; Poengsungnoen, Vasun; Rivas Plata, Eimy; Saipunkaew, Wanaruk; Sipman, Harrie J.M.; Sutjaritturakan, Jutarat; Van Den Broeck, Dries; von Konrat, Matt; Weerakoon, Gothamie; Lumbsch, H. Thorsten. 2014. One hundred and seventy-five new species of Graphidaceae: closing the gap or a drop in the bucket? Phytotaxa. 189(1):7-38.


    Google Scholar


    Graphidaceae, lichens, tropical crustose lichens

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page