Skip to Main Content
Experiment, monitoring, and gradient methods used to infer climate change effects on plant communities yield consistent patternsAuthor(s): Sarah C. Elmendorf; Gregory H.R. Henry; Robert D. Hollisterd; Anna Maria Fosaa; William A. Gould; Luise Hermanutz; Annika Hofgaard; Ingibjorg I. Jonsdottir; Janet C. Jorgenson; Esther Levesque; Borgbor Magnusson; Ulf Molau; Isla H. Myers-Smith; Steven F. Oberbauer; Christian Rixen; Craig E. Tweedie; Marilyn Walkers
Source: PNAS. 112(2): 448-452.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Download Publication (699.65 KB)
DescriptionInference about future climate change impacts typically relies on one of three approaches: manipulative experiments, historical comparisons (broadly defined to include monitoring the response to ambient climate fluctuations using repeat sampling of plots, dendroecology, and paleoecology techniques), and space-for-time substitutions derived from sampling along environmental gradients. Potential limitations of all three approaches are recognized. Here we address the congruence among these three main approaches by comparing the degree to which tundra plant community composition changes (i) in response to in situ experimental warming, (ii) with interannual variability in summer temperature within sites, and (iii) over spatial gradients in summer temperature. We analyzed changes in plant community composition from repeat sampling (85 plant communities in 28 regions) and experimental warming studies (28 experiments in 14 regions) throughout arctic and alpine North America and Europe. Increases in the relative abundance of species with a warmer thermal niche were observed in response to warmer summer temperatures using all three methods; however, effect sizes were greater over broadscale spatial gradients relative to either temporal variability in summer temperature within a site or summer temperature increases induced by experimental warming. The effect sizes for change over time within a site and with experimental warming were nearly identical. These results support the view that inferences based on space-for-time substitution overestimate the magnitude of responses to contemporary climate warming, because spatial gradients reflect long-term processes. In contrast, in situ experimental warming and monitoring approaches yield consistent estimates of the magnitude of response of plant communities to climate warming.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationElmendorf, Sarah C.; Henry, Gregory H.R.; Hollisterd, Robert D.; Fosaa, Anna Maria; Gould, William A.; Hermanutz, Luise; Hofgaard, Annika; Jonsdottir, Ingibjorg I.; Jorgenson, Janet C.; Levesque, Esther; Magnusson, Borgbor; Molau, Ulf; Myers-Smith, Isla H.; Oberbauer, Steven F.; Rixen, Christian;Tweedie, Criag E.; Walkers, Marilyn. 2015. Experiment, monitoring, and gradient methods used to infer climate change effects on plant communities yield consistent patterns. PNAS. 112(2): 448-452.
Keywordsthermophilization, space-for-time substitution, climate change, warming experiment, tundra
- Global assessment of experimental climate warming on tundra vegetation: heterogeneity over space and time
- Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome
- Continental-scale tree-ring-based projection of Douglas-fir growth: Testing the limits of space-for-time substitution
XML: View XML