Skip to Main Content
Resistance-surface-based wildlife conservation connectivity modeling: Summary of efforts in the United States and guide for practitionersAuthor(s): Alisa A. Wade; Kevin S. McKelvey; Michael K. Schwartz
Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-333. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 93 p.
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
View PDF (8.8 MB)
DescriptionResistance-surface-based connectivity modeling has become a widespread tool for conservation planning. The current ease with which connectivity models can be created, however, masks the numerous untested assumptions underlying both the rules that produce the resistance surface and the algorithms used to locate low-cost paths across the target landscape. Here we present a process to guide map creation, from conceptualization through validation, that seeks to better consider the complex biological issues inherent to connectivity modeling. Following this organized approach to connectivity modeling will help analysts prevent a plethora of issues common in recently created models, such as the failure to specify the temporal domain, purpose of the mapped connectivity, or the biological rationales for assigned pixel-level resistances. Following these steps will improve both the understanding and biological relevance of constructed connectivity maps.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationWade, Alisa A.; McKelvey, Kevin S.; Schwartz, Michael K. 2015. Resistance-surface-based wildlife conservation connectivity modeling: Summary of efforts in the United States and guide for practitioners. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-333. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 93 p.
Keywordsconnectivity, resistance surface, least-cost path, cost distance modeling, validation, models, conservation
- Why did the bear cross the road? Comparing the performance of multiple resistance surfaces and connectivity modeling methods
- Predicting landscape connectivity for the Asian elephant in its largest remaining subpopulation
- The devil is in the dispersers: Predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography
XML: View XML