Skip to Main Content
Identifying critical issues in recreation planning and management: improving the management-research partnershipAuthor(s): John H. Schomaker; David W. Lime
Source: Water Resources Bulletin. 24(3): 593-598.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: North Central Research Station
PDF: View PDF (108.89 KB)
DescriptionThe "nominal group" process is a proven technique to systematically arrive at a consensus about critical information needs in recreation planning and management. Using this process, 41 managers who attended a 1983 conference on river management identified 114 specific information needs grouped under 11 general questions. Clearly, some concerns of administrators are researchable; many are not.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationSchomaker, John H.; Lime, David W. 1988. Identifying critical issues in recreation planning and management: improving the management-research partnership. Water Resources Bulletin. 24(3): 593-598.
Keywordspublic involvement, meetings, technology transfer, river recreation, outdoor recreation management
- Adaptive ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest.
- A toolkit modeling approach for sustainable forest management planning: achieving balance between science and local needs
- New criteria for measuring range management activities.
XML: View XML