Skip to Main Content
Testing alternative response designs for training forest disturbance and attribution modelsAuthor(s): T. Schroeder; G. Moisen; K. Schleeweis
Source: The International Forestry Review. 16(5): 424.
Publication Series: Abstract
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
PDF: View PDF (69.41 KB)
DescriptionUnderstanding and modeling land cover and land use change is evolving into a foundational element of climate, environmental, and sustainability science. Land cover and land use data are core to applications such as carbon accounting, greenhouse gas emissions reporting, biomass and bioenergy assessments, hydrologic function assessments, fire and fuels planning and management, and forest and rangeland health assessments. Remote sensing-based monitoring efforts like the North American Forest Dynamics (NAFD) project, and the newly launched Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS), will provide land cover and land use change data on all U.S. lands for the longest possible historical period. Empirical models driving disturbance and causal maps rely on large quantities of high quality data. Many decisions need to be made about the size, shape, quantity, quality, and other details about the training plots themselves, i.e., the response design. Here, the authors explored best practices for collecting training data for these empirical models on 10 pilot scenes in the United States. Alternative designs were evaluated in terms of their costs and benefits for national mapping applications.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationSchroeder, T.; Moisen, G.; Schleeweis, K. 2014. Testing alternative response designs for training forest disturbance and attribution models. The International Forestry Review. 16(5): 424.
Keywordsforest disturbance, attribution models, land cover, land use, mapping applications
- Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: Fundamental principles
- A Tale of Two Forest Carbon Assessments in the Eastern United States: Forest Use Versus Cover as a Metric of Change
- Attributing causal agents to nationwide maps of forest disturbance
XML: View XML