Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): T.A. Clair; T. Blett; J. Aherne; M.P.M. Aidar; R. Artz; W.J. Bealey; W. Budd; J.N. Cape; C.J. Curtis; L. Duan; M.E. Fenn; P. Groffman; R. Haeuber; J.R. Hall; J.-P. Hettelingh; D. López-Hernández; B. Mathieson; L. Pardo; M. Posch; R.V. Pouyat; T. Spranger; H. Sverdrup; H. van Dobben; A. van Hinsberg
    Date: 2014
    Source: In: Sutton, M.A. et al., eds. Nitrogen Deposition, Critical Loads and Biodiversity. Netherlands: Springer: 481-491. Chapter 50
    Publication Series: Book Chapter
    PDF: View PDF  (1.31 MB)

    Description

    This chapter reports the findings of a Working Group to review the critical loads (CLs) and levels approach for nitrogen (N). The three main approaches to estimating CLs are empirical, mass balance and dynamic modelling. Examples are given of recent developments in Europe, North America and Asia and it is concluded that other countries should be encouraged to develop basic assessments using soil, land cover, and deposition map overlays in order to determine what regions might exceed nitrogen CLs. There is a need for increasing the certainty of critical load (CL) estimates by focusing on empirical data needs, especially for understudied ecosystems such as tropical or Mediterranean, high elevation environments, and aquatic systems. There is also a need to improve steady-state mass balance parameters, especially soil solution terms, such as nitrate leaching, used to determine the CL, and denitrification, which is an equation parameter. Improved dynamic models are needed for predicting plant community changes, and work should continue on existing models to determine CL values. Dynamic models require more data and are more complex than simple calculated CLs but offer more information and allow the development of 'what if?' scenarios. Optimal use of CLs requires expert knowledge of ecosystem values to provide reference states so that safe deposition amounts can be determined. Increased interaction between CL and biodiversity specialists to identify critical biodiversity limits would help provide better CL assessments.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Clair, T.A.; Blett, T.; Aherne, J.; Aidar, M.P.M.; Artz, R.; Bealey, W.J.; Budd, W.; Cape, J.N.; Curtis, C.J.; Duan, L.; Fenn, M.E.; Groffman, P.; Haeuber, R.; Hall, J.R.; Hettelingh, J.-P.; López-Hernández, D.; Mathieson, B.; Pardo, L.; Posch, M.; Pouyat, R.V.; Spranger, T.; Sverdrup, H.; van Dobben, H.; van Hinsberg, A. 2014. The critical loads and levels approach for nitrogen. In: Sutton, M.A., et al., eds. Nitrogen Deposition, Critical Loads and Biodiversity. Netherlands: Springer: 481-491. Chapter 50.

    Cited

    Google Scholar

    Keywords

    Critical loads, Empirical, Exceedance, Modelling, Nitrogen deposition

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page