Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): David W. Patterson; Nathan D. Hesterman; Charles Gatchell
    Date: 1991
    Source: Wood and Fiber Science. 23(2): 173-184.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Northeastern Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (0 B)


    Glueline continuity is very critical in standard-size hardwood blanks because the blanks are cut up into small furniture parts, and a small gap in the glueline of a blank may extend across the whole part—or a gap may appear as a crack in the final product. Strength is not a critical factor. The objective of this study was to determine if a gap in a glueline can be detected by mechanical means. Furniture manufacturers want to be sure that any blank that they buy will have continuous gluelines. Every blank should be nondestructively tested, and all blanks with a defective glueline should be rejected from the shipment. Black cherry, red oak, and yellow-poplar standard-size blanks 24 inches wide and 0.75 inches thick were manufactured. Some blanks were crosscut into strips two inches along the grain. The other blanks were cut 24 inches long. Foil defect strips were placed in the middle glueline of some panels to create a gap, thus achieving a range of effective gluelines of 60, 75, 90, and 100%. Static bending perpendicular to the grain, tension perpendicular to the grain, and torsion tests were developed for testing these specimens. Five parameters—modulus of rupture and modulus of elasticity in bending, tensile strength, torsional shear strength, and modulus of rigidity—were measured to determine their sensitivity for detecting defective gluelines. Based on the results of this study, tensile strength perpendicular to the grain is the most satisfactory parameter for detecting defective gluelines. Its combination of high sensitivity and low variability would result in the smallest amount of destruction of good panels, while failing a larger number of defective panels. It was found that mechanical methods are not appropriate for determining glueline continuity since none of the parameters studied is sufficiently sensitive to detect defects of 10% or less.

    Publication Notes

    • Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
    • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
    • During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
    • Please contact Sharon Hobrla, if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Patterson, David W.; Hesterman, Nathan D.; Gatchell, Charles, J. 1991. Testing glueline continuity in standard-size hardwood blanks by mechanical methods. Wood and Fiber Science. 23(2): 173-184.


    Mechanical tests, static bending perpendicular to the grain, tension perpendicular to the grain, torsion, plate twist, glueline continuity, standard-size blanks, hardwoods, red oak, black cherry, yellow-poplar

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page