Indirect nontarget effects of host-specific biological control agents: Implications for biological controlAuthor(s): Dean E. Pearson; Ragan M. Callaway
Source: Biological Control. 35: 288-298.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
Download Publication (0 B)
Classical biological control of weeds currently operates under the assumption that biological control agents are safe (i.e., low risk) if they do not directly attack nontarget species. However, recent studies indicate that even highly host-specific biological control agents can impact nontarget species through indirect effects. This finding has profound implications for biological control. To better understand the causes of these interactions and their implications, we evaluate recent case studies of indirect nontarget effects of biological control agents in the context of theoretical work in community ecology. We find that although particular indirect nontarget effects are extremely difficult to predict, all indirect nontarget effects of host specific biological control agents derive from the nature and strength of the interaction between the biological control agent and the pest. Additionally, recent theoretical work suggests that the degree of impact of a biological control agent on nontarget species is proportional to the agent’s abundance, which will be highest for moderately successful control agents. Therefore, the key to safeguarding against indirect nontarget effects of host-specific biological control agents is to ensure the biological control agents are not only host specific, but also efficacious. Biological control agents that greatly reduce their target species while remaining host-specific will reduce their own populations through density-dependent feedbacks that minimize risks to nontarget species.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
Pearson, Dean E.; Callaway, Ragan M. 2005. Indirect nontarget effects of host-specific biological control agents: Implications for biological control. Biological Control. 35: 288-298.
Keywordsbiological control, nontarget effects, host specificity, indirect effects, efficacy, natural enemies, multiple release approach, lottery approach, Peromyscus manipulates, Centaurea macula, Agapeta zoegana
- Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents
- Biological control agents elevate hantavirus by subsidizing deer mouse populations
- Non-target effects of an introduced biological control agent on deer mouse ecology
XML: View XML