Skip to Main Content
Exploring family forest landowner diversity: Place, race, and gender in Alabama, United StatesAuthor(s): John Schelhas; Yaoqui Zhang; Robert Zabawa; Bin Zheng
Source: International Journal of Social Forestry
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (288.0 KB)
DescriptionFamily forestry is characterized by heterogeneity in ownership structure, owners’ objectives, and management practices. Differences among forest landowners by age and occupation have been regularly documented, but other social dimensions, such as race and gender, have received considerably less attention. We conducted exploratory research on racial and gender differences among forest landowners in two Alabama counties via a mail survey in order to identify promising areas for future research and forestry outreach. We found that gender and race influence land holding practices, management objectives, access to information and technical support. African American and female forest landowners tend to be less involved in forest management but would like more information. Understanding how forest landowners from different social backgrounds use, value, and manage forest is crucial for developing appropriate programs to encourage landowners from all segments of society to manage their forests for private and public benefits, and further research is warranted.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationSchelhas, John; Zhang, Yaoqui; Zabawa, Robert; Zheng, Bin 2012. Exploring family forest landowner diversity: Place, race, and gender in Alabama, United States. International Journal of Social Forestry 5(1):1-21. 21 p.
Keywordsfemale forest landowners, non-industrial private forests, North America
- The social structure of family and farm forestry in Alabama
- Gender bias affects forests worldwide
- On-site wildland activity choices among African Americans and White Americans in the rural south: implications for management
XML: View XML