Skip to Main Content
Quality and yield of seven forages grown under partial shading of a simulated silvopastoral system in east TexasAuthor(s): J. Hill; K. Farrish; B. Oswald; L. Young; A. Shadow
Source: In: Proceedings of the 18th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-212. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 614 p.
Publication Series: Proceedings - Paper (PR-P)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (286.0 KB)
DescriptionThe goal of this project is to evaluate the growth and nutritional characteristics of seven forages, including various warm season native grasses, grown under simulated partial shading (50 percent typical of a loblolly pine silvopastoral system in east Texas. The results are from year two of a three year study. In order to meet the overall objective, individual, slatted shade structures were constructed that simulate the quantity, quality, and overall light regime found beneath loblolly pine stands arranged for silvopasture. The forages selected for the study include ‘Tifton 9’ bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), ‘Alamo’ switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), ‘Kaw’ Big Bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), ‘Americus’ Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), ‘Harrison’ Florida Paspalum (Paspalum floridanum), and Nacogdoches Eastern gamagrass (Tripsacum dactyloides). The experimental design is a two-way factorial design with forage type randomly assigned to plots, and shade treatment (0 percent, 50 percent) randomly assigned within forage type. Forage produced beneath the slats is managed to simulate intensive grazing, with recognition of minimum and optimal grazing heights based on forage type. Data is presented on dry matter yield, as well as several nutritional parameters including in vitro true digestibility (IVTD), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF). Results show that significant differences existed in all parameters (p < 0.0001) due to forage type. Significant differences existed due to shade treatment for all parameters except for ADF (p = 0.1324). Results showed that shade improved forage quality overall. It reduced NDF (p = 0.0399), increased CP (p = 0.0007), and increased digestibility IVTD (p < 0.0001). The study is currently in year two of three. Results are preliminary.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHill, J.; Farrish, K.; Oswald, B.; Young, L.; Shadow, A. 2016. Quality and yield of seven forages grown under partial shading of a simulated silvopastoral system in east Texas. In:Proceedings of the 18th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-212. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 5 p.
- New Applicators for Weed Control in Forest Nurseries and Plantations
- Techniques for establishing vegetation for long-term erosion control on disturbed slopes in Alabama
- Red Thread Found on Bermuda Grass
XML: View XML