Skip to Main Content
Evaluating methods to quantify spatial variation in the velocity of biological invasionsAuthor(s): Clement Tisseuil; Aiko Gryspeirt; Renaud Lancelot; Maryline Pioz; Andrew Liebhold; Marius Gilbert
Source: Ecography. 39(5): 409-418.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
Download Publication (861.0 KB)
DescriptionInvading species rarely spread homogeneously through a landscape and invasion patterns typically display irregular frontal boundaries as the invasion progresses through space. Those irregular patterns are generally produced by local environmental factors that may slow or accelerate movement of the frontal boundary. While there is an abundant literature on species distribution modelling methods that quantify local suitability for species establishment, comparatively few studies have examined methods for measuring the local velocity of invasions that can then be statistically analysed in relation to spatially variable environmental factors. Previous studies have used simulations to compare different methods for estimating the overall rate of spread of an invasion. We adopted a similar approach of simulating invasions that resemble two real case studies, both in terms of their spatial resolution (i.e. considering the size of one cell as one km) and their spatial extent (>600 000 km2). Simulations were sampled to compare how different methods used to measure local spread rate, namely the neighbouring, nearest distance and Delaunay methods, perform for spatio-temporal comparisons. We varied the assessment using three levels of complexity of the spatio-temporal pattern of invasion, three sample sizes (500, 1000 and 2000 points), three different spatial sampling patterns (stratified, random, aggregated), three interpolation methods (generalized linear model, kriging, thin plate spline regression) and two spatio-temporal modelling structures (trend surface analysis and boundary displacement), resulting in a total of 486 different scenarios. The thin plate spline regression interpolation method, in combination with trend surface analysis, was found to provide the most robust local spread rate quantification as it was able to reliably accommodate different sampling conditions and invasion patterns. This best approach was successfully applied to two case-studies, the invasion of France by the horse-chestnut leafminer Cameraria ohridella and by the bluetongue virus, generally in agreement with previously published values of spread rates. Potential avenues for further research are discussed.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationTisseuil, Clement; Gryspeirt, Aiko; Lancelot, Renaud; Pioz, Maryline; Liebhold, Andrew; Gilbert, Marius. 2016. Evaluating methods to quantify spatial variation in the velocity of biological invasions. Ecography. 39(5): 409-418.
- Comparing methods for measuring the rate of spread of invading populations
- Estimating spread rates of non-native species: the gypsy moth as a case study
- Quantifying spatio-temporal variation of invasion spread
XML: View XML