Skip to Main Content
Comparison of Field Methods and Models to Estimate Mean Crown DiameterAuthor(s): William A. Bechtold; Manfred E. Mielke; Stanley J. Zarnoch
Source: Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 19, No. 4, p. 177-182 December 2002.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (134 KB)
DescriptionThe direct measurement of crown diameters with logger's tapes adds significantly to the cost of extensive forest inventories. We undertook a study of 100 trees to compare this measurement method to four alternatives-two field instruments, ocular estimates, and regression models. Using the taping method as the standard of comparison, accuracy of the tested alternatives was adequate for softwood species, but short of the specified measurement quality objectivefor estimating the mean crown diameter of hardwoods. Due to savings infield costs, ocular estimation and regression models were the best alternatives to direct measurement with logger's tapes.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBechtold, William A.; Mielke, Manfred E.; Zarnoch, Stanley J. 2002. Comparison of Field Methods and Models to Estimate Mean Crown Diameter. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 19, No. 4, p. 177-182 December 2002.
- The Relationship of Diameter at Breast Height and Crown Diameter for Four Species Groups in Hardin County, Tennessee
- Estimating tree crown widths for the primary Acadian species in Maine
- Modeling individual tree growth by fusing diameter tape and increment core data
XML: View XML