Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Michaela Foster; M. Nils Peterson; Frederick Cubbage; Gerard McMahon
    Date: 2016
    Source: Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Southern Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (125.0 KB)


    The number of studies evaluating the quality and content of many types of plans have grown in recent decades. Natural resource conservation plans have been included in some of these plan evaluation studies; however, no meta-analysis of natural resource planning literature has been conducted. This focus is needed because natural resource conservation planning differs from other types (e.g., hazards mitigation, urban planning), in that planners often come from natural resource backgrounds, must plan in compliance with federal and state planning mandates, and typically operate under the assumption that natural resources have a use value and are shared resources. We selected 10 natural resource conservation plan evaluation studies in peer reviewed literature, identified the plan components being evaluated and the methods used in each study, and compared our findings to two other plan evaluation meta-analyses in the literature. We found that natural resource conservation plan evaluation studies followed many of the same practices as the general body of evaluation studies but tended to focus more on goals, policies, implementation, and coordination. Compliance and stakeholder engagement were key gaps in natural resource conservation plan evaluation studies, and these findings highlight a need for more emphasis on these components among natural resource planners. We also found that natural resource conservation plan evaluation studies largely incorporated best practices for plan evaluation methodology. However, few studies provided the evaluation tool used, indicated whether or not the evaluation tool had been pretested, or reported intercoder reliability scores. These protocols should be incorporated and reported in future natural resource plan evaluation research. Future work could link planning efforts, planning laws and mandates, and plan quality to planning outcomes.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Foster, Michaela; Peterson, M. Nils; Cubbage, Frederick; McMahon, Gerard. 2016. Meta-analysis of natura; resource conservation plan evaluations. Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 3: 296-302. 7 p.


    conservation, meta-analysis, natural resources, planning, plan evaluation, plan quality

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page