Baseflow physical characteristics differ at multiple spatial scales in stream networks across diverse biomesAuthor(s): Janine Ruegg; Walter K. Dodds; Melinda D. Daniels; Ken R. Sheehan; Christina L. Baker; William B. Bowden; Kaitlin J. Farrell; Michael B. Flinn; Tamara K. Harms; Jeremy B. Jones; Lauren E. Koenig; John S. Kominoski; William H. McDowell; Samuel P. Parker; Amy D. Rosemond; Matt T. Trentman; Matt Whiles; Wilfred M. Wollheim
Source: Landscape Ecology
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
View PDF (697.0 KB)
Spatial scaling of ecological processes is facilitated by quantifying underlying habitat attributes. Physical and ecological patterns are often measured at disparate spatial scales limiting our ability to quantify ecological processes at broader spatial scales using physical attributes.
We characterized variation of physical stream attributes during periods of high biological activity (i.e., baseflow) to match physical and ecological measurements and to identify the spatial scales exhibiting and predicting heterogeneity.
We measured canopy cover, wetted width, water depth, and sediment size along transects of 1st–5th order reaches in five stream networks located in biomes from tropical forest to arctic tundra. We used hierarchical analysis of variance with three nested scales (watersheds, stream orders, reaches) to identify scales exhibiting significant heterogeneity in attributes and regression analyses to characterize gradients within and across stream networks.
Heterogeneity was evident at one or multiple spatial scales: canopy cover and water depth varied significantly at all three spatial scales while wetted width varied at two scales (stream order and reach) and sediment size remained largely unexplained. Similarly, prediction by drainage area depended on the attribute considered: depending on the watershed, increases in wetted width and water depth with drainage area were best fit with a linear, logarithmic, or power function. Variation in sediment size was independent of drainage area.
The scaling of ecologically relevant baseflow physical characteristics will require study beyond the traditional bankfull geomorphology since predictions of baseflow physical attributes by drainage area were not always best explained by geomorphic power laws.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationRuegg, Janine; Dodds, Walter K.; Daniels, Melinda D.; Sheehan, Ken R.; Baker, Christina L.; Bowden, William B.; Farrell, Kaitlin J.; Flinn, Michael B.; Harms, Tamara K.; Jones, Jeremy B.; Koenig, Lauren E.; Kominoski, John S.; McDowell, William H.; Parker, Samuel P.; Rosemond, Amy D.; Trentman, Matt T.; Whiles, Matt; Wollheim, Wilfred M. 2016. Baseflow physical characteristics differ at multiple spatial scales in stream networks across diverse biomes. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 31(1): 119-136. 18 p. 10.1007/s10980-015-0289-y
KeywordsGeomorphology, Nested ANOVA, scaling, grasslands, temperate forest, Boreal forest
- Lithological and fluvial controls on the geomorphology of tropical montane stream channels in Puerto Rico
- Modeling streams and hydrogeomorphic attributes in Oregon from digital and field data
- A comparison of MIKE SHE and DRAINMOD for modeling forested wetland hydrology in coastal South Carolina, USA
XML: View XML