Skip to Main Content
Determining the effects of felling method and season of year on the regeneration of short rotation coppiceAuthor(s): Daniel P.L. de Souza; Tom Gallagher; Dana Mitchell; Tim McDonald; Mathew Smidt
Source: International Journal of Forest Engineering
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
Download Publication (1.0 MB)
DescriptionThere is increasing interest in plantations with the objective of producing biomass for energy and fuel. These types of plantations are called Short Rotation Woody Crops (SRWC). Popular SRWC species are Eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.), Cottonwood (Populus deltoides) and Willow (Salix spp.). These species have in common strong growth rates, the ability to coppice, and rotations of 2–10 years. SRWC have generated interest for many forest products’ companies (seeking for diversification or energy self-sufficiency) and private landowners, and although they might help with the supply for the expected growth on the bioenergy and biofuels market, there are still several concerns about how and when to harvest SRWC to maximize their ability to coppice. SRWC have elevated establishment and maintenance costs if compared to other type of plantations, but due to the coppicing ability, the same plantation may be harvested up to 5 times without the need of establishing a new one. Study plots were installed at six locations in Florida, Mississippi and Arkansas, and were cut with a chainsaw and a shear head during summer and winter, to determine the effects of felling method and season on coppice regeneration. Thus, plots were divided into areas of four different treatments: shear-winter, saw-winter, shear-summer, saw-summer. Harvesting eucalypt and cottonwood trees during winter resulted in better survival rates than harvesting during summer; however, there was no effect of felling method on coppice regeneration. Finally, no statistically significant difference was found on coppice regeneration of black willow when harvested during winter or summer with a chainsaw or a shear head.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
Citationde Souza, Daniel P.L.; Gallagher, Tom; Mitchell, Dana; McDonald, Tim; Smidt, Mathew. 2016. Determining the effects of felling method and season of year on the regeneration of short rotation coppice. International Journal of Forest Engineering, Vol. 27(1): 13 pages.: 53-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2015.1135616
Keywordsshort rotation woody crops, woody biomass harvest, eucalypt, cottonwood, willow, bioenergy
- Determining the impact of felling method and season of year on coppice regeneration
- Coppicing evaluation of short rotation coppice in the southeast of the U.S. to determine appropriate harvesting methods.
- Coppicing evaluation in the southern USA to determine harvesting methods for bioenergy production
XML: View XML