Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Kevin McGarigal; Samuel Cushman; Claudia Regan
    Date: 2005
    Source: Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Department of Natural Resources Conservation. 113 p.
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous
    Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
    PDF: View PDF  (421.0 KB)

    Description

    Anthropogenic habitat loss and fragmentation have been implicated as among the key drivers of the burgeoning global biodiversity crisis. In response, there is a growing mandate among natural resource managers to evaluate the impacts of proposed management actions on the extent and fragmentation of habitats. Unfortunately, few guidelines exist to help managers understand the many complex issues involved in the quantitative assessment of habitat loss and fragmentation. In our Primer, we explore habitat fragmentation as a landscape-level process in which a specific habitat is progressively sub-divided into smaller, geometrically altered, and more isolated fragments as a result of both natural and human activities. We describe alternative perspectives on fragmentation in which habitat patches are viewed either as analogs of oceanic islands embedded in an ecologically neutral sea or as patches of variable quality embedded within a complex and heterogeneous mosaic of patches of varying suitability and affects on habitat connectivity. In the conventional island biogeographic perspective, habitat loss and fragmentation is described as a landscape transformation process involving several recognizable phases that are demarcated by significant changes in the pattern or function of the landscape. We describe the key spatial components of habitat loss and fragmentation: habitat extent, subdivision, geometry, isolation, and connectivity, and their affects on individual behavior and habitat use, population structure and viability, and interspecific interactions. Finally, we view the evidence, both theoretical and empirical, regarding the issue of when is habitat fragmentation important, and conclude that it depends not only on the pattern of habitat distribution but on the life history characteristics (e.g., dispersal capabilities) of the target organism(s).

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    McGarigal, Kevin; Cushman, Sam; Regan, Claudia. 2005. Quantifying terrestrial habitat loss and fragmentation: A protocol. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Department of Natural Resources Conservation. 113 p.

    Keywords

    habitat loss, fragmentation, biodiversity

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/52866