Protecting the source: Tools to evaluate fuel treatment cost vs. water quality protectionAuthor(s): Brian Cooke; William Elliot; Mary Ellen Miller; Mark Finney; Matthew Thompson
Source: Science You Can Use Bulletin, Issue 21. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Research Station. 9 p.
Publication Series: Science Bulletins and Newsletters
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (0 B)
High-intensity wildfires are one of the leading causes of severe soil erosion in western U.S. watersheds. This erosion can lead to disruptive deposits of sediment in reservoirs and water supply systems. Fuel treatments such as controlled burns and forest thinning can reduce wildfire intensity and help preserve topsoil. But while these treatments are generally much less expensive than firefighting, property loss, and sediment removal, there are limited funds available for controlled burns and forest thinning. For this reason, land managers can benefit from estimating the erosion potential of high-intensity wildfires in order to decide where to focus fuel reduction efforts.
To help forest managers prioritize forest fuel reduction decisions, scientists from the Rocky Mountain Research Station and other agencies and organizations have developed several modeling tools that predict fire risk and erosion potential in and around watersheds. These tools, which include FSim, FlamMap, and WEPP (Water Erosion Prediction Project), are helping land managers preserve long-term forest health and preserve water supply and access in the western United States. By helping to quantify the connection between forest management and water supply protection, these tools are helping land managers cultivate stakeholder support for forest management efforts.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
Cooke, Brian; Elliot, Bill; Miller, Mary Ellen; Finney, Mark; Thompson, Matthew. 2016. Protecting the source: Tools to evaluate fuel treatment cost vs. water quality protection. Science You Can Use Bulletin, Issue 21. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Research Station. 9 p.
Keywordswater quality, erosion, fire risk, fuel reduction, WEPP
- Rill erosion rates in burned forests
- From watersheds to the web: Online tools for modeling forest soil erosion
- Modeling erosion on steep sagebrush rangeland before and after prescribed fire
XML: View XML