Skip to Main Content
How far to the nearest road?Author(s): Kurt H. Riitters; James D. Wickham
Source: Front Ecol Environ 2003; 1(3): 125–129
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: Download Publication (2.4 MB)
DescriptionEcological impacts from roads may be the rule rather than the exception in most of the conterminous United States. We measured the proportion of land area that was located within nine distances from the nearest road of any type, and mapped the results for 164 ecoregions and 2108 watersheds nationwide. Overall, 20% of the total land area was within 127 m of a road, and the proportion increased rapidly with distance, so that 83% was within 1061 m of a road, and only 3% was more than 5176 m away. For forest land area only, the proportions differed by less than 2% for all distances. Regions with more than 60% of their total land area within 382 m of a road may be at greatest risk of cumulative ecological impacts from roads. These regions include nearly all coastal zones, as well as substantial portions of the southeast US and the basins of the Ohio, Brazos, Colorado, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Rivers.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationRiitters, Kurt H.; Wickham, James D. 2003. How far to the nearest road?. Front Ecol Environ 2003; 1(3): 125–129
- Landscape correlates of forest plant invasions: A high-resolution analysis across the eastern United States
- Herptofaunal species richness responses to forest landscape structure in Arkansas
- Response of nesting northern goshawks to logging truck noise in northern Arizona
XML: View XML