Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Dexter H. Locke; Shawn M. Landry; J. Morgan Grove; Rinku Roy Chowdhury
    Date: 2016
    Source: Journal of Urban Ecology
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Northern Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (804.0 KB)

    Description

    The uneven provisioning of ecosystem services has important policy implications; yet the spatial heterogeneity of tree canopy remains understudied. Private residential lands are important to the future of Philadelphia’s urban forest because a majority of the existing and possible tree canopy is located on residential land uses. This article examines the spatial distribution of tree canopy in Philadelphia, PA and its social correlates. How are existing tree canopy and opportunities for additional tree canopy distributed across the city of Philadelphia and with respect to three explanations: (i) population density, (ii) the social stratification luxury effect, and 3) lifestyle characteristics of residents? This study used spatial autoregressive regression (SAR), geographically weighted regression (GWR) and multilevel modeling (MLM) to evaluate population density, social stratification luxury effect, and lifestyle characteristics as explanations of the spatial distribution of existing and possible tree canopy, and simultaneously evaluate the efficacy of different statistical analysis techniques. To control for spatial autocorrelation, SAR models were estimated, GWR models were fit to examine potential spatial non-stationarity and realism of the SAR analyses. The MLMs both controlled for spatial autocorrelation (like SAR) but also allow local variation and spatial non-stationarity (like GWR). The multimodel inferential approach showed the statistical models that included lifestyle characteristics outperformed the social stratification and population density models. Our results cast doubt on findings from previous studies using areal units such as block groups. More sophisticated statistical analyses suggest opportunities for enhancing theory and the need to reconsider frequently used methods.

    Publication Notes

    • Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
    • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
    • During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
    • Please contact Sharon Hobrla, shobrla@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Locke, Dexter H.; Landry, Shawn M.; Grove, J. Morgan; Roy Chowdhury, Rinku. 2016. What’s scale got to do with it? Models for urban tree canopy. Journal of Urban Ecology. 2(1): juw006-. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juw006.

    Cited

    Google Scholar

    Keywords

    urban vegetation, multi-level modeling, mixed effects models, urban ecology, tree canopy, Philadelphia

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/53415