Skip to Main Content
Seven decades of change in forest structure and composition in Pinus resinosa forests in northern Minnesota, USA: Comparing managed and unmanaged conditionsAuthor(s): Brian D. Young; Anthony W. D'Amato; Christel C. Kern; Douglas N. Kastendick; Brian J. Palik
Source: Forest Ecology and Management
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
Download Publication (1.0 MB)
DescriptionAn understanding of long-term patterns of forest structural and compositional development is critical for anticipating management outcomes and developing appropriate silvicultural strategies for restoring complex forest conditions. In most cases, this information comes from stand-level assessments; however, the impacts and outcomes of management and other disturbances on forest development occur over multiple spatial scales across a landscape. We compared historical (1941) and contemporary (2012–2014) forest structure and composition on 301 plots distributed across managed and unmanaged, late seral red pine (Pinus resinosa)-dominated forests in a 1230 ha landscape in north-central Minnesota, USA. Discriminate factor analysis was used to determine which compositional and structural attributes best described the forest conditions between two sampling periods (1941, 2012–2014) and management histories (managed and unmanaged). Plot basal area, average diameter of live trees, richness of tree size classes, and the basal area of standing deadwood were the four most important variables in discriminating between the managed and unmanaged plots in 1941 and 2013. In some cases, structural conditions between managed and unmanaged plots converged, including contemporary BA, trees per hectare, size inequality, and structural complexity indices. In contrast, several attributes, including standing deadwood basal area and percent hardwood basal area, were significantly greater in unmanaged plots after 72 years and highlight the lasting influence of land use on these structural and compositional conditions. The broad ranges of structural and compositional conditions observed across the landscape highlight the importance of having spatially varying desired future conditions across managed stands to approximate this range in live and dead-tree attributes in unmanaged forests. In addition, the lower basal area of standing dead trees documented in this and other comparisons of unmanaged and managed P. resinosa systems argues for an increased emphasis on deliberate deadwood and live-tree retention to recruit these features if the restoration of late-successional forest conditions is included as a management objective.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationYoung, Brian D.; D'Amato, Anthony W.; Kern, Christel C.; Kastendick, Douglas N.; Palik, Brian J. 2017. Seven decades of change in forest structure and composition in Pinus resinosa forests in northern Minnesota, USA: Comparing managed and unmanaged conditions. Forest Ecology and Management. 395: 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.04.003.
KeywordsForest structure, Pinus resinosa, Tree species diversity, Spatial diversity, Forest structure, Permanent sample plots
- Variable retention harvesting in Great Lakes mixed-pine forests: emulating a natural model in managed ecosystems
- Carbon stocks across a chronosequence of thinned and unmanaged red pine (Pinus resinosa) stands
- Long-term management impacts on carbon storage in Lake States forests
XML: View XML