Skip to Main Content
Ten-year performance of the United States national elm trialAuthor(s): Jason J. Griffin; William R. Jacobi; E. Gregory McPherson; Clifford S. Sadof; James R. McKenna; Mark L. Gleason; Nicole Ward Gauthier; Daniel A. Potter; David R. Smitley; Gerard C. Adams; Ann Brooks Gould; Christian R. Cash; James A. Walla; Mark C. Starrett; Gary Chastagner; Jeff L. Sibley; Vera A. Krischik; Adam F. Newby
Source: Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 43(3): 108-121.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Southwest Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (1.0 MB)
DescriptionUlmus americana (American elm) was an important urban tree in North America prior to the introduction of the Dutch elm disease pathogen in 1930. Subsequently, urban and community forests were devastated by the loss of large canopies. Tree improvement programs produced disease tolerant American and Eurasian elm cultivars and introduced them into the nursery industry. However, consumer acceptance was slow. The National Elm Trial was established to evaluate commercially available taxa of elm across the United States. Established at 16 locations, these plantings monitored survival and growth, as well as disease and insect pressure for 7 to 10 years. ‘Morton’ elm had >90% survival, while 13 cultivars averaged 70% to 90%, and five cultivars ranged from 25% to 69% survival. Trunk diameter growth by location ranged from 0.5 cm/year (Colorado, U.S.) to more than 2.0 cm/year (Iowa, U.S.). By taxa, trunk diameter growth ranged from a low, by ‘JFS Bieberich’ elm (0.7 cm/year), to a high by ‘New Horizon’ elm (1.7 cm/year). Scale insects were minor issues at most trial locations, except Colorado, where scales contributed to the death of several cultivars. Performance ratings (scale 1 to 5) ranged from 2.7 for ‘JFS Bieberich’ elm to 4.5 for ‘New Horizon’ elm. Based on the ratings, the preferred cultivars of American elm were ‘New Harmony’ and ‘Princeton’, and the preferred cultivars of Asian elm were The Morton Arboretum introductions and ‘New Horizon’. These findings will help green-industry professionals determine what elm cultivars will perform the best in different regions.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGriffin, Jason J.; Jacobi, William R.; McPherson, E. Gregory; Sadof, Clifford S.; McKenna, James R.; Gleason, Mark L.; Gauthier, Nicole Ward; Potter, Daniel A.; Smitley, David R.; Adams, Gerard C.; Gould, Ann Brooks; Cash, Christian R.; Walla, James A.; Starrett, Mark C.; Chastagner, Gary; Sibley, Jeff L.; Krischik, Vera A.; Newby, Adam F. 2017. Ten-year performance of the United States national elm trial. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 43(3): 108-121.
KeywordsChalkbark Elm, Japanese Elm, Lacebark Elm, Scotch Elm, Siberian Elm, Smoothleaf Elm, Tree Evaluation, Ulmus carpinifolia, Ulmus glabra, Ulmus japonica, Ulmus parvifolia, Ulmus propinqua, Ulmus pumila, Ulmus wilsoniana, Urban Forestry, Wilson Elm
- Proceedings of the American elm restoration workshop 2016
- Dutch elm disease pathogen transmission by the banded elm bark beetle Scolytus schevyrewi
- Use of culture filtrates of Ceratocystis ulmi as a bioassay to screen for disease tolerant Ulmus americana
XML: View XML