Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Mary M. Conner; John J. KeaneClaire V. GallagherThomas E. Munton; Paula A. Shaklee
    Date: 2016
    Source: Ecosphere. 7(10): e01538.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Pacific Southwest Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (1.0 MB)


    Monitoring studies often use marked animals to estimate population abundance at small spatial scales. However, at smaller scales, occupancy sampling, which uses detection/nondetection data, may be useful where sites are approximately territories, and occupancy dynamics should be strongly correlated with population dynamics. Occupancy monitoring has advantages in that it is less expensive and invasive, and marked animals are not needed. Here, we used empirical data to determine whether and when change in occupancy is a good proxy for population change for a territorial species. As part of this overall goal, we also compared maximum-likelihood estimates using a model-averaging approach with a Bayesian MCMC approach. We used field data collected from 1993 to 2013 on three study areas for California spotted owls (Strix occidentalis occidentalis), a territorial species. Although correlations for trajectories of realized population change (Δt) between territory occupancy and Pradel models were moderate to high for Bayesian MCMC-based estimates and high for model-averaged estimates, magnitudes of the trajectories were different with the Pradel model reporting greater magnitudes of change. For the two areas showing a decline, Δt for the Pradel model was approximately 20–30% lower than for the occupancy model, and 25% higher in the area showing an increase. These differences can arise because the occupancy model is less sensitive, in that if two owls share a territory, the loss of one may be reflected in survival and, consequently in Δt by the Pradel model, but because the territory remains occupied it is not reflected by the occupancy model. Bayesian MCMC-based and model-averaged estimates of Δt were in close agreement in pattern (correlation ≥0.74) and magnitude (relative differences of last Δt were ≤5%) for both occupancy and mark–resight models. Results from the Pradel model may lead to conservation actions necessary to avoid high extinction or extirpation risk for small populations, while results from the territory occupancy model may result in status quo management. We found both Bayesian MCMC-based and model-averaged estimates of Δt robust approaches to evaluate population trends. However, we recommend the Bayesian MCMC approach for estimating risk (e.g., probability of declines) for retrospective analyses.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Conner, Mary M.; Keane, John J.; Gallagher, Claire V.; Munton, Thomas E.; Shaklee, Paula A. 2016. Comparing estimates of population change from occupancy and mark-recapture models for a territorial species. Ecosphere. 7(10): e01538.


    Google Scholar


    Bayesian MCMC approach, California spotted owl, mark–resight, monitoring, occupancy model, Pradel’s temporal symmetry model, realized population change, Sierra Nevada, Strix occidentalis occidentalis.

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page