Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
Assessing mismatches in ecosystem services proficiency across the urban fabric of Porto (Portugal): The influence of structural and socioeconomic variablesAuthor(s): Marisa S. Graça; João F. Gonçalves; Paulo J.M. Alves; David J. Nowak; Robert Hoehn; Alexis Ellis; Paulo Farinha-Marques; Mario Cunha
Source: Ecosystem Services
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
View PDF (746.0 KB)
DescriptionAccording to UN estimates, it is expected that the world population living in cities will exceed 66% in 2050 (United Nations, 2014). The complex and intense interaction of ecological and socioeconomic systems shaping cities has highlighted the need to foster an interdisciplinary approach to urban issues integrating Natural and Social Sciences (Alberti et al., 2003). Recent research has also stressed the role of urban ecosystems in providing vital services to city dwellers, and the need to embody ecosystem services in urban planning practice (Ahern et al., 2014; Colding, 2011). Ecosystem services (ES) has come to light as one of the most widespread concepts of Ecology in recent years, and refers to the benefits human populations derive from ecosystems (MEA, 2005). Research on ES and the socio-ecological factors that influence their proficiency is essential to allow cities to adopt policies that lead to resource-efficient strategies (Andersson et al., 2007) and greater resilience, which supports ecological, economic and social sustainability (Berkes et al., 2003; McPhearson et al., 2015). Some benefits generated by ecosystems need to be delivered locally to be enjoyed by city inhabitants, such as clean air, runoff regulation, microclimate regulation, erosion control, storm protection and recreation. Urban green areas provide a wide range of these local ecosystem services and thus become very important to sustain human wellbeing in cities (Bolund and Hunhammar, 1999). However, many obstacles prevent ES from being widely operational in urban planning practice. Studies and assessments of urban ES many times lack operability for professionals and planners because they are not developed at a scale relevant for planning and policy decisions (Hölzinger et al., 2014) or do not address the transfer of knowledge and methods in an accessible way to stakeholders, thus providing limited clues for planning and management (Haase et al., 2014). In addition, key concepts remain controversial (Fisher et al., 2009; Hermann et al., 2011), and the lack of consistent methodologies for quantifying, visualizing and valuing ES poses challenges (Seppelt et al., 2011).
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGraça, Marisa S.; Gonçalves, João F.; Alves, Paulo J.M.; Nowak, David J.; Hoehn, Robert; Ellis, Alexis; Farinha-Marques, Paulo; Cunha, Mario. 2017. Assessing mismatches in ecosystem services proficiency across the urban fabric of Porto (Portugal): The influence of structural and socioeconomic variables. Ecosystem Services. 23: 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.015.
KeywordsUrban ecosystem services, Regulating ecosystem services, Urban planning, Urban vegetation, Socioeconomic inequity
- Modeling hydrologic responses to deforestation/forestation and climate change at multiple scales in the Southern US and China
- Power in urban social-ecological systems: Processes and practices of governance and marginalization
- Dynamic heterogeneity: a framework to promote ecological integration and hypothesis generation in urban systems
XML: View XML