Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Warren B. CohenSean P. Healey; Zhiqiang Yang; Stephen V. Stehman; C. Kenneth Brewer; Evan B. Brooks; Noel Gorelick; Chengqaun Huang; M. Joseph Hughes; Robert E. Kennedy; Thomas R. Loveland; Gretchen G. Moisen; Todd A. Schroeder; James E. Vogelmann; Curtis E. Woodcock; Limin Yang; Zhe Zhu
    Date: 2017
    Source: Forests. 8: 98.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (3.0 MB)

    Description

    Disturbance is a critical ecological process in forested systems, and disturbance maps are important for understanding forest dynamics. Landsat data are a key remote sensing dataset for monitoring forest disturbance and there recently has been major growth in the development of disturbance mapping algorithms. Many of these algorithms take advantage of the high temporal data volume to mine subtle signals in Landsat time series, but as those signals become subtler, they are more likely to be mixed with noise in Landsat data. This study examines the similarity among seven different algorithms in their ability to map the full range of magnitudes of forest disturbance over six different Landsat scenes distributed across the conterminous US. The maps agreed very well in terms of the amount of undisturbed forest over time; however, for the ~30% of forest mapped as disturbed in a given year by at least one algorithm, there was little agreement about which pixels were affected. Algorithms that targeted higher-magnitude disturbances exhibited higher omission errors but lower commission errors than those targeting a broader range of disturbance magnitudes. These results suggest that a user of any given forest disturbance map should understand the map’s strengths and weaknesses (in terms of omission and commission error rates), with respect to the disturbance targets of interest.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Cohen, Warren B.; Healey, Sean P.; Yang, Zhiqiang; Stehman, Stephen V.; Brewer, C. Kenneth; Brooks, Evan B.; Gorelick, Noel; Huang, Chengqaun; Hughes, M. Joseph; Kennedy, Robert E.; Loveland, Thomas R.; Moisen, Gretchen G.; Schroeder, Todd A.; Vogelmann, James E.; Woodcock, Curtis E.; Yang, Limin; Zhu, Zhe. 2017. How similar are forest disturbance maps derived from different Landsat time series algorithms? Forests. 8: 98.

    Cited

    Google Scholar

    Keywords

    remote sensing, change detection, Landsat time series, forest disturbance

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/54976