Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Herbert Ssegane; D.M. Amatya; Augustine Muwamba; George M. Chescheir; Tim Appelboom; E.W. Tollner; Jami E. Nettles; Mohamed A. Youssef; Francois Birgand; R.W. Skaggs
    Date: 2017
    Source: Hydrological Processes
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Southern Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (1.0 MB)


    Historically, paired watershed studies have been used to quantify the hydrological effects of land use and management practices by concurrently monitoring two similar watersheds during calibration (pre-treatment) and post-treatment periods. This study characterizes seasonal water table and flow response to rainfall during the calibration period and tests a change detection technique of moving sums of recursive residuals (MOSUM) to select calibration periods for each control-treatment watershed pair when the regression coefficients for daily water table elevation (WTE) were most stable to minimize regression model uncertainty. The control and treatment watersheds were one watershed of 3−4 year-old intensely managed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) with natural understory, one watershed of 3−4 year-old loblolly pine intercropped with switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), one watershed of 14−15 year-old thinned loblolly pine with natural understory (control), and one watershed of switchgrass only. The study period spanned from 2009 to 2012. Silvicultural operational practices during this period acted as external factors, potentially shifting hydrologic calibration relationships between control and treatment watersheds. MOSUM results indicated significant changes in regression parameters due to silvicultural operations and were used to identify stable relationships for WTE. None of the calibration relationships developed using this method were significantly different from the classical calibration relationship based on published historical data. We attribute that to the similarity of historical and 2010−2012 leaf area index (LAI) on control and treatment watersheds as moderated by the emergent vegetation. While the MOSUM approach does not eliminate the need for true calibration data or replace the classic paired watershed approach, our results show that it may be an effective alternative approach when true data is unavailable, as it minimizes the impacts of external disturbances other than the treatment of interest.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Ssegane, Herbert ; Amatya, D.M.; Muwamba, Augustine; Chescheir, George M.; Appelboom, Tim; Tollner, E.W.; Nettles, Jami E.; Youssef, Mohamed A.; Birgand, Francois; Skaggs, R.W. 2017.Calibration of paired watersheds: Utility of moving sums in presence of externalities. Hydrological Processes.  1-14.


    Google Scholar


    bioenergy, block bootstrap resampling, geometric regression, model uncertainty, moving sums, recursive residuals, silvicultural operations, water table

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page