Skip to Main Content
Wildfire communication and climate risk mitigationAuthor(s): Robyn S. Wilson; Sarah M. McCaffrey; Eric Toman
Source: In: Oxford encyclopedia of climate science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 31 p.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
Download Publication (253.0 KB)
DescriptionThroughout the late 19th century and most of the 20th century, risks associated with wildfire were addressed by suppressing fires as quickly as possible. However, by the 1960s, it became clear that fire exclusion policies were having adverse effects on ecological health, as well as contributing to larger and more damaging wildfires over time. Although federal fire policy has changed to allow fire to be used as a management tool on the landscape, this change has been slow to take place, while the number of people living in high-risk wildland–urban interface communities continues to increase. Under a variety of climate scenarios, in particular for states in the western United States, it is expected that the frequency and severity of fires will continue to increase, posing even greater risks to local communities and regional economies. Resource managers and public safety officials are increasingly aware of the need for strategic communication to both encourage appropriate risk mitigation behavior at the household level, as well as build continued public support for the use of fire as a management tool aimed at reducing future wildfire risk. Household decision making encompasses both proactively engaging in risk mitigation activities on private property, as well as taking appropriate action during a wildfire event to protect personal safety. Very little research has directly explored the connection between climate-related beliefs, wildfire risk perception, and action; however, the limited existing research suggests that climate-related beliefs have little direct effect on wildfire-related action. Instead, action appears to depend on understanding the benefits of different mitigation actions and in engaging the public in interactive, participatory communication programs that build trust between the public and natural resource managers. A relatively new line of research focuses on resource managers as critical decision makers in the risk management process, pointing to the need to thoughtfully engage audiences other than the lay public to improve risk management. Ultimately, improving the decision making of both the public and managers charged with mitigating the risks associated with wildfire can be achieved by carefully addressing several common themes from the literature. These themes are to (1) promote increased efficacy through interactive learning, (2) build trust and capacity through social interaction, (3) account for behavioral constraints and barriers to action, and (4) facilitate thoughtful consideration of risk-benefit tradeoffs. Careful attention to these challenges will improve the likelihood of successfully managing the increasing risks that wildfire poses to the public and ecosystems alike in a changing climate.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationWilson, Robyn S.; McCaffrey, Sarah M.; Toman, Eric. 2017. Wildfire communication and climate risk mitigation. In: Oxford encyclopedia of climate science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 31 p. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.570.
Keywordswildfire, risk communication, evacuation, management, hazard, decision making, trust, risk perception, efficacy
- Protect Thy Neighbor: Investigating the Spatial Externalities of Community Wildfire Hazard Mitigation
- Working forests, forest health and management challenges in the redwood region
- Shared values and trust: the experience of community residents in a fire-prone ecosystem
XML: View XML