Skip to Main Content
Comparison of four harvesting systems in a loblolly pine plantationAuthor(s): J. Klepac; Dana Mitchell
Source: Professional Agricultural Workers Journal
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (307.0 KB)
DescriptionFelling and skidding operations were monitored while clearcut harvesting a 12-acre area of a 14-year old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation. The study area contained 465 trees per acre for trees 2.0 inches Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) and larger with a Quadratic Mean Diameter (QMD) of 7.26 inches. Two feller-bunchers (tracked and rubber-tired) and two skidders (conventional and large capacity) were paired to create four different harvesting systems which were randomly assigned to 3-acre units for evaluation of production rates and costs. Each system was balanced to determine the number of machines needed to minimize the cost of producing each ton of wood. Cost from woods to landing ranged from $1.92/ton to $3.16/ton. The two systems that incorporated the large capacity skidder performed better, and at a lower cost per ton, than the systems that used the conventional skidder.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationKlepac, John; Mitchell, Dana. 2016. Comparison of four harvesting systems in a loblolly pine plantation. Professional Agricultural Workers Journal: 4(1): 9-23.
KeywordsProductivity, Cost, Felling, Skidding, Biomass Harvesting
- Feasibility of utilizing small diameter southern pine for biomass in the Virginia Coastal Plain
- Harvesting small trees for bio-energy
- A strategic assessment of forest biomass and fuel reduction treatments in western states
XML: View XML