Skip to Main Content
Analysis of improved criteria for mold growth in ASHRAE standard 160 by comparison with field observationsAuthor(s): Samuel V. Glass; Stanley D. Gatland II; Kohta Ueno; Christopher J. Schumacher
Source: In: Mukhopadhyaya, P; Fisler, D., eds. Advances in hygrothermal performance of building envelopes: materials, systems and simulations, ASTM STP1599. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International: 1-27.
Publication Series: Book Chapter
Station: Forest Products Laboratory
View PDF (1.0 MB)
DescriptionASHRAE Standard 160, Criteria for Moisture-Control Design Analysis in Buildings, was published in 2009. The standard sets criteria for moisture design loads, hygrothermal analysis methods, and satisfactory moisture performance of the building envelope. One of the evaluation criteria specifies conditions necessary to avoid mold growth. The current standard requires that the 30-day running average relative humidity at the material surface be less than 80 % when the 30-day running average surface temperature is between 5°C (41°F) and 40°C (104°F). This criterion was intended to strike a balance between the need for simplicity to make the standard useful and the complex reality of mold growth, which varies with mold species and depends on the type of material, water activity, temperature, and other factors. Since the standard was published, many practitioners have maintained that the mold criterion is too stringent. Assemblies known to have satisfactory performance in the field do not meet the criterion under hygrothermal simulation. A recent addendum to ASHRAE Standard 160 replaced the simplified mold criterion with a state-ofthe- art empirical model that describes mold growth and decline over time using a mold index. This model takes into account the sensitivity of the material, the surface temperature, and the surface relative humidity. This paper provides an overview of the mold index model and a series of comparisons between field observations of visible mold growth or lack thereof on woodbased sheathing and model predictions that use measured surface temperature and relative humidity values as inputs. The field data are from published studies on above-grade wood-frame wall assemblies and roof assemblies covering a range of climate zones. Our analysis indicates that the current 30-day criterion in ASHRAE Standard 160 fails many assemblies in which visible mold growth did not occur. In contrast, the mold index model predictions give better agreement with observations.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGlass, Samuel V.; Gatland II, Stanley D.; Ueno, Kohta; Schumacher, Christopher J. 2017. Analysis of improved criteria for mold growth in ASHRAE standard 160 by comparison with field observations. In: Mukhopadhyaya, P; Fisler, D., eds. Advances in hygrothermal performance of building envelopes: materials, systems and simulations, ASTM STP1599. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International: 1-27.
KeywordsMoisture control, building envelope, hygrothermal performance, hygrothermal analysis, simulation, mold growth, mold index, durability, failure criteria, ASHRAE Standard 160
- Corrosion of Embedded Metals in Wood: An Overview of Recent Research with Implications for building moisture design
- Hygrothermal Simulation: A Tool for Building Envelope Design Analysis
- Comparing the Methodologies in ASTM G198: Is There an Easy Way Out?
XML: View XML