Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Stan T. LebowPatricia K. LebowGrant T. Kirker
    Date: 2017
    Source: In: McCown, C.; Gothard, T.; Staula, B., eds. Proceedings, One hundred thirteenth annual meeting of the American wood protection association. Birmingham, AL: American Wood Protection Association: 246-256.
    Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
    Station: Forest Products Laboratory
    PDF: Download Publication  (1.0 MB)

    Description

    Stake tests are a critical part of evaluating durability of wood in ground-contact, but there is a lack of criteria for interpreting stake test results. This paper discusses criteria that might be used to determine if short term ratings indicate satisfactory longterm performance. Ratings of 19 by 19 mm stakes from multiple plots in the Harrison Experimental Forest, Mississippi, were analyzed to determine how well performance criteria at years three, four, or five predicted durability over the longer term (nine years). Results revealed that with only three years of data, false prediction of satisfactory performance was common even when strict criteria were applied. Predictions of future performance improved with four and five years of data, although some instances of false prediction still occurred. These analyses indicate that with three to five years of data, even very slight differences between ratings of a Test treatment and a Reference preservative may indicate unsatisfactory future performance. However, variability in the ratings of the standard reference preservative can make it difficult to detect slight differences and increasing the number of replicates may be warranted. More complex statistical approaches that incorporate all years of rating data into comparisons may help to account for year to year variation in ratings. This analysis was limited to one test site and a similar type of analysis for other test sites would be beneficial.

    Publication Notes

    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Lebow, Stan T.; Lebow, Patricia K.; Kirker, Grant T. 2017. Comparison of performance criteria for evaluating stake test data. In: McCown, C.; Gothard, T.; Staula, B., eds. Proceedings, One hundred thirteenth annual meeting of the American wood protection association. Birmingham, AL: American Wood Protection Association: 246-256.

    Keywords

    Stake testing, ratings, performance criteria, prediction

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/55842