Skip to Main Content
A comparative life-cycle assessment of briquetting logging residues and lumber manufacturing coproducts in western United StatesAuthor(s): Sevda Alanya-Rosenbaum; Richard D. Bergman; Indroneil Ganguly; Francesca Pierobon
Source: Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 34(1): 11-24.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Forest Products Laboratory
Download Publication (5.0 MB)
DescriptionTimber harvest activities in the western United States have resulted in large volumes of low- to no-value logging (forest) residues. Alternatives to pile-and-burning are needed to best utilize this material and to mitigate the resultant environmental impacts. Briquetting (densifying) forest residues near-woods is one such option and is the focus of this study. This study presents a cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment (LCA) performed to evaluate the overall environmental impacts associated with briquetting post-harvest forest residues and dry sawmill residues (sawdust) in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) region of the United States. Environmental impacts resulting from the two briquette production systems were compared with firewood and propane production, which are common residential heating sources in rural areas of the PNW, on a per 1 MJ of useful energy for domestic heating. In the briquetted post-harvest forest residue system, the feedstock preparation stage had the largest share in global warming (GW) impact, mainly resulting from the drying process (69.5%), followed by transportation. Valorization of post-harvest forest residues, in combination with a briquetter, to produce a bioenergy carrier was revealed to be advantageous in smog, acidification, and eutrophication impact categories, with considerable environmental benefits from avoided pile-and-burn emissions. With all scenarios investigated, briquette production from post-harvest forest residues with high dryer efficiency showed lowest GW impact compared to briquetting sawmill residues and firewood supply chain. For a scenario analysis, LCA showed that using a diesel generator to support the forest residue briquetter operation resulted in 45% higher GW impact compared to use of a wood-gas-powered generator.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationAlanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda; Bergman, Richard D.; Ganguly, Indroneil; Pierobon, Francesca. 2018. A comparative life-cycle assessment of briquetting logging residues and lumber manufacturing coproducts in western United States. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 34(1): 11-24.
KeywordsBioenergy, biomass densification, briquette, forest residues, life-cycle assessment, sawdust
- Using life-cycle assessment to evaluate environmental impacts of briquette production from forest residues
- Life-cycle impact and exergy based resource use assessment of torrefied and non-torrefied briquette use for heat and electricity generation
- Using life-cycle assessment to evaluate environmental impacts of torrefied briquette production from forest residues
XML: View XML