Skip to Main Content
How can my research paper be useful for future meta-analyses on forest restoration practices?Author(s): Enrique Andivia; Pedro Villar‑Salvador; Juan A. Oliet; Jaime Puertolas; R. Kasten Dumroese
Source: New Forests. doi: 10.1007/s11056-018-9631-y.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
View PDF (695.0 KB)
DescriptionStatistical meta-analysis is a powerful and useful tool to quantitatively synthesize the information conveyed in published studies on a particular topic. It allows identifying and quantifying overall patterns and exploring causes of variation. The inclusion of published works in meta-analyses requires, however, a minimum quality standard of the reported data and information on the methodology used. Our experience with conducting a meta-analysis on the relationship between seedling quality and field performance is that nearly one third of the apparently relevant publications had to be discarded because essential data, usually statistical dispersion parameters, were not properly reported. In addition, we encountered substantial difficulty to explore the effect of covariates due to the poor description of nursery cultivation methods, plantation location, and management in a significant proportion of the selected primary studies. Thus, we present guidelines for improving methodology detail and data presentation so that future forest restoration-oriented research can be more readily incorporated into meta-analyses. In general, research studies should report data on means, sample size, and any measure of variation even if they are not statistically significant. The online availability of raw data is the best practice to facilitate the inclusion of primary research on meta-analyses. Providing full information about the production of nursery seedlings, such as plant material and experimental conditions, is essential to test whether these procedures might have an effect on seedling quality. In addition, detailed information about field trials such as site climate, soil preparation techniques, previous land use, or post-plantation management, is needed to elucidate whether seedling quality is context-dependent. Thus, we provide a detailed checklist of important information that should be included when reporting forest restoration research involving the use of nursery-produced seedlings. All this will help to quantitatively synthetize current state-of-knowledge and thus contribute to the advancement of the forest restoration discipline.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationAndivia, Enrique; Villar‑Salvador, Pedro; Oliet, Juan A.; Puertolas, Jaime; Dumroese, R. Kasten. 2018. How can my research paper be useful for future meta-analyses on forest restoration practices? New Forests. doi: 10.1007/s11056-018-9631-y.
Keywordsdata quality, data reporting, meta-analysis, methodology guideline, seedling quality, research synthesis
- Factors associated with family forest owner actions: A vote-count meta-analysis
- Planting and care of fine hardwood seedlings: Nursery production of hardwood seedlings
- BIOFRAG - a new database for analyzing BIOdiversity responses to forest FRAGmentation
XML: View XML