Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): T. M. Wilcox; K. J. CarimM. K. YoungK. S. McKelveyT. W. FranklinM. K. Schwartz
    Date: 2018
    Source: North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 38: 592-596.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (85.0 KB)


    Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling - which enables inferences of species’ presence from genetic material in the environment - is a powerful tool for sampling rare fishes. Numerous studies have demonstrated that eDNA sampling generally provides greater probabilities of detection than traditional techniques (e.g., Thomsen et al. 2012; McKelvey et al. 2016; Valentini et al. 2016; Wilcox et al. 2016). In contrast, Ulibarri et al. (2017) and Perez et al. (2017) reported unusually low rates of eDNA detection at sites known to be occupied by the target species. These authors claim their results demonstrate that traditional sampling methods, based on best practices developed by experienced biologists (Bonar et al. 2009), are more accurate and sensitive for rare species detection than eDNA sampling. We believe the authors would have achieved substantially higher species detection rates and provided more useful comparisons with traditional sampling methods if they had adopted best practices for eDNA sampling (e.g., Goldberg et al. 2016). Here we focus on three elements of eDNA sampling and analysis that are critical to maximizing species detection rates: (1) the volume of water sampled in the field, (2) the volume of each sample that is analyzed in the laboratory, and (3) assessment of potential chemical inhibitors of laboratory eDNA detection.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Wilcox, T. M.; Carim, K. J.; Young, M. K.; McKelvey, K. S.; Franklin, T. W.; Schwartz, M. K. 2018. The importance of sound methodology in environmental DNA sampling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 38: 592-596.


    Google Scholar


    environmental DNA, eDNA, sampling, rare species, fish

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page