Skip to Main Content
Factors driving natural regeneration beneath a planted urban forestAuthor(s): Danica A. Doroski; Alexander J. Felson; Mark A. Bradford; Mark P. Ashton; Emily E. Oldfield; Richard A. Hallett; Sara E. Kuebbing
Source: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
Download Publication (855.0 KB)
DescriptionCities around the world are investing in urban forest plantings as a form of green infrastructure. The aim is that these plantations will develop into naturally-regenerating native forest stands. However, woody plant recruitment is often cited as the most limiting factor to creating self-sustaining urban forests. As such, there is interest in site treatments that promote recruitment of native woody species and simultaneously suppress woody non-native recruitment. We tested how three, common site treatments—compost, nurse shrubs, and tree species composition (six-species vs. two-species)—affected woody plant recruitment in 54 experimental plots beneath a largescale tree planting within a high-traffic urban park. We identified naturally regenerating seedling and sapling species and measured their abundance six-years after the site was planted. This enabled us to examine initial recruitment dynamics (i.e. seedlings) and gain a better understanding of seedling success as they transition to the midstory (i.e. saplings). Seedling and sapling recruitment (native and total) was greater in areas with higher canopy cover. The combination of the nurse shrub treatment with compost and species composition (six-species) treatments increased seedling recruitment by 47% and 156%, respectively; however, the nurse shrub treatment by itself decreased seedling recruitment by 5% and native seedling recruitment by 35%. The compost treatment alone had no effect on the total number of recruits but resulted in 76% more non-native seedlings. The sizes of these treatment effects were strongly dependent on whether the forest plantings were in open areas, versus areas with existing tree canopy, the latter condition facilitating recruitment. Our findings therefore suggest that combinations of site treatments, paired with broad canopy tree species, may be most effective for promoting regeneration of native species resulting in more self-sustaining urban forests.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationDoroski, Danica A.; Felson, Alexander J.; Bradford, Mark A.; Ashton, Mark P.; Oldfield, Emily E.; Hallett, Richard A.; Kuebbing, Sara E. 2018. Factors driving natural regeneration beneath a planted urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 29: 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.019.
KeywordsAfforestation, Compost, Invasive species, New York city, Recruitment, Reforestation
- Positive effects of afforestation efforts on the health of urban soils
- Woody plant communities along urban, suburban, and rural streams in Louisville, Kentucky, USA
- Growing the urban forest: tree performance in response to biotic and abiotic land management
XML: View XML