Skip to Main Content
Priority actions to improve provenance decision-makingAuthor(s): Martin F. Breed; Peter A. Harrison; Armin Bischoff; Paula Durruty; Nick J. C. Gellie; Emily K. Gonzales; Kayri Havens; Marion Karmann; Francis F. Kilkenny; Siegfried L. Krauss; Andrew J. Lowe; Pedro Marques; Paul G. Nevill; Pati L. Vitt; Anna Bucharova
Source: Bioscience. 68(7): 510-516.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
Download Publication (489.0 KB)
Related Research Highlights
Selecting the provenance: Local native or nonlocal native?
DescriptionSelecting the geographic origin - the provenance - of seed is a key decision in restoration. The last decade has seen a vigorous debate on whether to use local or nonlocal seed. The use of local seed has been the preferred approach because it is expected to maintain local adaptation and avoid deleterious population effects (e.g., maladaptation and outbreeding depression). However, the impacts of habitat fragmentation and climate change on plant populations have driven the debate on whether the local-is-best standard needs changing. This debate has largely been theoretical in nature, which hampers provenance decision-making. Here, we detail cross-sector priority actions to improve provenance decision-making, including embedding provenance trials into restoration projects; developing dynamic, evidence-based provenance policies; and establishing stronger research-practitioner collaborations to facilitate the adoption of research outcomes. We discuss how to tackle these priority actions in order to help satisfy the restoration sector’s requirement for appropriately provenanced seed.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBreed, Martin F.; Harrison, Peter A.; Bischoff, Armin; Durruty, Paula; Gellie, Nick J. C.; Gonzales, Emily K.; Havens, Kayri; Karmann, Marion; Kilkenny, Francis F.; Krauss, Siegfried L.; Lowe, Andrew J.; Marques, Pedro; Nevill, Paul G.; Vitt, Pati L.; Bucharova, Anna. 2018. Priority actions to improve provenance decision-making. Bioscience. 68(7): 510-516.
Keywordsassisted migration, ecological restoration, local adaptation, restoration genetics
- Restoration handbook for sagebrush steppe ecosystems with emphasis on greater sage-grouse habitat - Part 2: Landscape level restoration decisions
- Northwest U.S. agriculture in a changing climate: collaboratively defined research and extension priorities
- Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale
XML: View XML