Skip to Main Content
Weighing values and risks of beloved invasive species: The case of the survivor tree and conflict management in urban green infrastructureAuthor(s): Heather McMillen; Lindsay K. Campbell; Erika S. Svendsen
Source: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
Download Publication (7.0 MB)
DescriptionA critical aspect of urban green infrastructure management hinges on the treatment of native and invasive species. Invasive species are widely seen as a major threat, yet the context-specific values people have for some of these species pose challenges for their management. Here, we offer a case study of the 9/11 survivor tree, a Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana Decne.) that survived the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 at the World Trade Center in New York City and has since become a symbol of resilience. That individual tree and its progeny are beloved and they are also characterized as invasive. As part of the longitudinal research of the US Forest Service Living Memorials Project, we report findings from semi-structured interviews conducted with eight stewards from six living memorial sites that have survivor trees and with five individuals who have expert knowledge of the survivor tree, its propagation and dissemination. We find that some people see the tree primarily as a heroic symbol of hope and resilience, others see it primarily a threat to personal property, safety, and to biodiversity, which overshadow its social value. We conclude that Callery pears are associated with multiple, conflicting values, having the power to both unite and divide around issues of recovery and resilience in social and ecological spheres. Whereas managers and policy makers tend to have absolute views of invasive species as negative, living memorial stewards and others affected by tragedies have personal relationships that significantly influence their attitudes and practices toward a line of Callery pears. We conclude that urban green infrastructure management might best be seen as a highly contingent and value-driven practice, and that understanding these social meanings may lead to better stewardship of the whole social-ecological system.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMcMillen, Heather; Campbell, Lindsay K.; Svendsen, Erika S. 2019. Weighing values and risks of beloved invasive species: The case of the survivor tree and conflict management in urban green infrastructure. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 40: 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.023.
KeywordsInvasive trees, Living memorial, Callery pear, Pyrus calleryana Decne., Resilience, Urban social-ecological system
- Co-creators of memory, metaphors for resilience, and mechanisms for recovery: flora in living memorials to 9/11
- Host tree resistance against the polyphagous
- Differences in accumulation of PAHs and metals on the leaves of Tilia x euchlora and Pyrus calleryana
XML: View XML