Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): T. Adam Coates; Thomas A. Waldrop; Victor B. Shelburne; Hoke S. Hill
    Date: 2018
    Source: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Southern Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (1.0 MB)


    Destructive core sampling is the most recognized technique for soil bulk density estimation to monitor soil compaction. This study was conducted to determine if soil bulk density sampler size would impact value estimates and silvicultural treatment distinctions in southeastern Piedmont forest soils of the Clemson Experimental Forest, Clemson, South Carolina, USA. In 2004, six hundred soils were sampled using both an Oakfield Soil Probe (diameter 2.5 cm) and an AMS, Inc. Slide Hammer (diameter 5.1 cm). The smaller, Oakfield Soil Probe values were greater than the larger, AMS Inc. Slide Hammer values (p < 0.0001) and values from both samplers were greater in the thin and burn treatments than the control treatments (p < 0.007). Strong correlation of the values between the samplers was also demonstrated (p < 00001; r2 = 0.62). These results highlight the utility of the smaller Oakfield Soil Probe when accessibility and intensity may impose sampling constraints. Abbreviations: AMS=AMS Inc. Slide Hammer; CEF=Clemson Experimental Forest; Db=soil bulk density; FFS=National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study; OSP=Oakfield Model H Soil Probe; SOC=soil organic carbon

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Coates, T. Adam; Waldrop, Thomas A.; Shelburne, Victor B.; Hill, Hoke S. 2018. Does sampler size affect southeastern Piedmont forest soil bulk density estimation?. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 49(6): 701-707.


    Google Scholar


    Forest restoration, forest soils, silviculture, soil bulk density, soil compaction

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page