Forest ecosystem-service transitions: the ecological dimensions of the forest transitionAuthor(s): Sarah Jane Wilson; John Schelhas; Ricardo Grau; A. Sofía Nanni; Sean Sloan
Source: Ecology and Society
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
Download Publication (1.0 MB)
New forests are expanding around the world. In many regions, regrowth rates are surpassing deforestation rates, resulting in “forest transitions,” or net gains in forest cover. Typically measured only in terms of aggregate“'forest cover” change, these new forests are ecologically distinct from each other and from those originally cleared. We ask, what are the ecological attributes, goods, and services we might expect from different pathways of forest recovery? To address this question, we proposed a typology of forest transitions that reflects both their social drivers and ecological outcomes: tree plantation, spontaneous regeneration, and agroforestry transitions. Using case studies, we illustrate how the ecological outcomes of each transition type differ and change over time. We mapped the global distribution of forest-transition types to identify global epicenters of each, and found that spontaneous transitions are most common globally, especially in Latin America; agroforestry transitions predominate in Europe and Central America; and plantation transitions occur in parts of Europe and Asia. We proposed a conceptual framework to understand and compare the ecological services arising from different types of forest transitions over time: forest ecosystem-service transition curves. This framework illustrates that carbon sequestration tends to be comparatively lower in agroforestry transitions, and biodiversity recovery is lower in industrial plantations. Spontaneously regenerating forests tend to have relatively high biodiversity and biomass but provide fewer provisioning and economically valuable services. This framework captures the dynamism that we observe in forest transitions, thus illustrating that different social drivers produce different types of ecosystem-service transitions, and that as secondary forests grow, these services will change over time at rates that differ among transition types. Ultimately, this framework can guide future research, describe actual and potential changes in ecosystem services associated with different types of transitions, and promote management plans that incorporate forest cover changes with the services and benefits they provide.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationWilson, Sarah Jane; Schelhas, John; Grau, Ricardo; Nanni, A. Sofía; Sloan, Sean. 2017. Forest ecosystem-service transitions: the ecological dimensions of the forest transition. Ecology and Society. 22(4) https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09615-220438.
Keywordsbiodiversity, carbon, ecosystem services, forest conservation, forest cover change, forest transition, land use change, plantations, secondary forest
- Planted forests and natural regeneration in forest transitions: patterns and implications from the U.S. South
- Grassland to shrubland state transitions enhance carbon sequestration in the northern Chihuahuan Desert
- Surface fuel loads following a coastal–transitional fire of unprecedented severity: Boulder Creek fire case study
XML: View XML