Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Joseph C. Blankinship; Asmeret Asefaw Berhe; Susan E. Crow; Jennifer L. Druhan; Katherine A. Heckman; Marco Keiluweit; Corey R. Lawrence; Erika Marín-Spiotta; Alain F. Plante; Craig Rasmussen; Christina Schädel; Joshua P. Schimel; Carlos A. Sierra; Aaron Thompson; Rota Wagai; William R. Wieder
    Date: 2018
    Source: Biogeochemistry
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Northern Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (412.0 KB)


    Soil organic matter (SOM) turnover increasingly is conceptualized as a tension between accessibility to microorganisms and protection from decomposition via physical and chemical association with minerals in emerging soil biogeochemical theory. Yet, these components are missing from the original mathematical models of belowground carbon dynamics and remain underrepresented in more recent compartmental models that separate SOM into discrete pools with differing turnover times. Thus, a gap currently exists between the emergent understanding of SOM dynamics and our ability to improve terrestrial biogeochemical projections that rely on the existing models. In this opinion paper, we portray the SOM paradigm as a triangle composed of three nodes: conceptual theory, analytical measurement, and numerical models. In successful approaches, we contend that the nodes are connected—models capture the essential features of dominant theories while measurement tools generate data adequate to parameterize and evaluate the models—and balanced—models can inspire new theories via emergent behaviors, pushing empiricists to devise new measurements. Many exciting advances recently pushed the boundaries on one or more nodes. However, newly integrated triangles have yet to coalesce. We conclude that our ability to incorporate mechanisms of microbial decomposition and physicochemical protection into predictions of SOM change is limited by current disconnections and imbalances among theory, measurement, and modeling. Opportunities to reintegrate the three components of the SOM paradigm exist by carefully considering their linkages and feedbacks at specific scales of observation.

    Publication Notes

    • Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
    • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
    • During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
    • Please contact Sharon Hobrla, if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Blankinship, Joseph C.; Berhe, Asmeret Asefaw; Crow, Susan E.; Druhan, Jennifer L.; Heckman, Katherine A.; Keiluweit, Marco; Lawrence, Corey R.; Marín-Spiotta, Erika; Plante, Alain F.; Rasmussen, Craig; Schädel, Christina; Schimel, Joshua P.; Sierra, Carlos A.; Thompson, Aaron; Wagai, Rota; Wieder, William R. 2018. Improving understanding of soil organic matter dynamics by triangulating theories, measurements, and models. Biogeochemistry. 140(1): 1-13.


    Google Scholar


    Biogeochemical models, Carbon stabilization, Decomposition, Global carbon cycle, Soil organic matter

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page