Skip to Main Content
Soil-contact decay tests using small blocks : a procedural analysisAuthor(s): Rodney C. De Groot; James W. Evans; Paul G. Forsyth; Camille M. Freitag; Jeffrey J. Morrell
Source: (Research paper FPL ; RP-571):7 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)
Station: Forest Products Laboratory
PDF: View PDF (328 KB)
DescriptionMuch discussion has been held regarding the merits of laboratory decay tests compared with field tests to evaluate wood preservatives. In this study, procedural aspects of soil jar decay tests with 1 cm 3 blocks were critically examined. Differences among individual bottles were a major source of variation in this method. The reproducibility and sensitivity of the soil-jar method using small blocks must be further characterized before it can be accepted as a standard protocol for evaluating preservative-treated wood.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationDe Groot, Rodney C.; Evans, James W.; Forsyth, Paul G.; Freitag, Camille M.; Morrell, Jeffrey J. Soil-contact decay tests using small blocks : a procedural analysis. (Research paper FPL ; RP-571):7 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
KeywordsDecay, Soil blocks, Wood preservatives, Methodology
- Changes in cation concentrations in red spruce wood decayed by brown rot and white rot fungi
- The role of extractives in naturally durable wood species
- Flavanoid biocides: Wood preservatives based on condensed tannins
XML: View XML