Skip to Main Content
Use of LiDAR to define habitat thresholds for forest bird conservationAuthor(s): James E. Garabedian; Christopher E. Moorman; M. Nils Peterson; John C. Kilgo
Source: Forest Ecology and Management
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
Download Publication (1.0 MB)
DescriptionQuantifying species-habitat relationships provides guidance for establishment of recovery standards for endangered species, but research on forest bird habitat has been limited by availability of fine-grained forest structure data across broad extents. New tools for collection of data on forest bird response to fine-grained forest structure provide opportunities to evaluate habitat thresholds for forest birds. We used LiDAR-derived estimates of habitat attributes and resource selection to evaluate foraging habitat thresholds for recovery of the federally endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Leuconotopicus borealis; RCW) on the Savannah River Site, South Carolina. First, we generated utilization distributions to define habitat use and availability for 30 RCW groups surveyed over a >4-h period twice per month between April 2013 and March 2015. Next, we used piecewise regression to characterize RCW threshold responses to LiDAR-derived habitat attributes described in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service recovery plan for RCW. Finally, we used resource utilization functions to estimate selection of specific habitat thresholds and used the magnitude of selection to prioritize thresholds for conservation. We identified lower and upper thresholds for densities of pines ≥35.6 cm dbh (22, 65 trees/ha), basal area (BA) of pines ≥25.4 cm dbh (1.4, 2.2 m2/ha), hardwood canopy cover (6, 31%), and BA of hardwoods 7.6–22.9 cm dbh (0.4, 6.07 m2/ha); we identified three thresholds for density of pines 7.6–25.4 cm dbh (56, 341, and 401 trees/ha). Selection rankings prioritized foraging habitat with <6% hardwood canopy cover (β = 0.254, 95% CI = 0.172–0.336), < 1.2 m2/ha BA of hardwoods 7.6–22.9 cm dbh (β = 0.162, 95% CI = 0.050–0.275), ≥1.4 m2/ha BA of pines ≥25.4 cm dbh (β = 0.055, 95% CI = 0.022–0.087), and ≥22 pines ≥35.6 cm dbh/ha (β = 0.015, 95% CI = 0.013–0.042). We identified habitat thresholds corresponding to open canopy structure, moderate densities of large and medium pines, and sparse hardwood midstory trees. Selection ranks prioritized multiple thresholds below USFWS range-wide recovery thresholds, indicating site-specific management goals may be beneficial for RCW conservation. Fine-grained LiDAR-derived habitat data coupled with GPS-derived habitat use can guide forest bird conservation by identifying the full range of structural conditions associated with threshold responses.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGarabedian, James E.; Moorman, Christopher E.; Nils Peterson, M.; Kilgo, John C. 2017. Use of LiDAR to define habitat thresholds for forest bird conservation. Forest Ecology and Management. 399: 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.024.
KeywordsForest Structure, Habitat Thresholds, LiDAR, Pine, Red-cockaded Woodpecker, Resource Selection
- Effects of group size and group density on trade‐offs in resource selection by a group‐territorial central‐place foraging woodpecker
- Summer roosting by adult male seminole bats in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas
- Roost selection by male and female northern long-eared bats in a pine-dominated landscape
XML: View XML