Skip to Main Content
Comparing predicted historical distributions of tree species using two tree-based ensemble classification methodsAuthor(s): Brice B. Hanberry; Hong S. He; Brian J. Palik
Source: American Midland Naturalist. 168(2): 443-455.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (1.0 MB)
DescriptionFine scale spatial mapping of historical tree records over large extents is important for determining historical species distributions. We compared performance of two ensemble methods based on classification trees, random forests, and boosted classification, for mapping continuous historical distributions of tree species. We used a combination of soil and terrain predictor variables to predict species distributions for 21 tree species, or species groups, from historical tree surveys in the Missouri Ozarks. Mean true positive rates and AUC values of all species combined for random forests and boosted classification, at a modeling prevalence and threshold of 0.5, were similar and ranged from 0.80 to 0.84. Although prediction probabilities were correlated (mean r = 0.93), predicted probabilities from random forests generated maps with more variation within subsections, whereas boosted classification was better able to differentiate the restricted range of shortleaf pine. Both random forests and boosted classification performed well at predicting species distributions over large extents. Comparison of species distributions from two or more statistical methods permits selection of the most appropriate models. Because ensemble classification trees incorporate environmental predictors, they should improve current methods used for mapping historical trees species distributions and increase the understanding of historical distributions of species.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHanberry, Brice B.; He, Hong S.; Palik, Brian J. 2012. Comparing predicted historical distributions of tree species using two tree-based ensemble classification methods. American Midland Naturalist. 168(2): 443-455.
- A survival model for individual shortleaf pine trees in even-aged natural stands
- Random forests and stochastic gradient boosting for predicting tree canopy cover: Comparing tuning processes and model performance
- Development of a shortleaf pine individual-tree growth equation using non-linear mixed modeling techniques
XML: View XML