Skip to Main Content
Integrating subjective and objective dimensions of resilience in fire-prone landscapesAuthor(s): Philip E. Higuera; Alexander L. Metcalf; Carol Miller; Brian Buma; David B. McWethy; Elizabeth C. Metcalf; Zak Ratajczak; Cara R. Nelson; Brian C. Chaffin; Richard C. Stedman; Sarah McCaffrey; Tania Schoennagel; Brian J. Harvey; Sharon M. Hood; Courtney A. Schultz; Anne E. Black; David Campbell; Julia H. Haggerty; Robert E. Keane; Meg A. Krawchuk; Judith C. Kulig; Rebekah Rafferty; Arika Virapongse
Source: BioScience. 69(5): 379-388.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
Download Publication (1.0 MB)
DescriptionResilience has become a common goal for science-based natural resource management, particularly in the context of changing climate and disturbance regimes. Integrating varying perspectives and definitions of resilience is a complex and often unrecognized challenge to applying resilience concepts to social-ecological systems (SESs) management. Using wildfire as an example, we develop a framework to expose and separate two important dimensions of resilience: the inherent properties that maintain structure, function, or states of an SES and the human perceptions of desirable or valued components of an SES. In doing so, the framework distinguishes between value-free and human-derived, value-explicit dimensions of resilience. Four archetypal scenarios highlight that ecological resilience and human values do not always align and that recognizing and anticipating potential misalignment is critical for developing effective management goals. Our framework clarifies existing resilience theory, connects literature across disciplines, and facilitates use of the resilience concept in research and land-management applications.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHiguera, Philip E.; Metcalf, Alexander L.; Miller, Carol; Buma, Brian; McWethy, David B.; Metcalf, Elizabeth C.; Ratajczak, Zak; Nelson, Cara R.; Chaffin, Brian C.; Stedman, Richard C.; McCaffrey, Sarah; Schoennagel, Tania; Harvey, Brian J.; Hood, Sharon M.; Schultz, Courtney A.; Black, Anne E.; Campbell, David; Haggerty, Julia H.; Keane, Robert E.; Krawchuk, Meg A.; Kulig, Judith C.; Rafferty, Rebekah; Virapongse, Arika. 2019. Integrating subjective and objective dimensions of resilience in fire-prone landscapes. BioScience. 69(5): 379-388.
Keywordsadaptation, ecological resilience, social resilience, social-ecological systems, wildfire, wildland
- Modeling human-environmental systems
- Social and environmental sustainability in large-scale coastal zones: Taking an issue-based approach to the implementation of the Prince William Sound sustainable human use framework
- Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance
XML: View XML