Skip to Main Content
Reply to Cruz and Alexander: Comments on “Evaluating Crown Fire Rate of Spread Predictions from Physics-Based Models"Author(s): C. M. Hoffman; J. Ziegler; R. R. Linn; J. Canfield; W. Mell; C. H. Sieg; F. Pimont
Source: Fire Technology. 55: 1927-1929.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
Download Publication (156.0 KB)
DescriptionWe have read Cruz and Alexander’s comments regarding our manuscript titled ‘‘Evaluating Crown Fire Rate of Spread Predictions from Physics-Based Models’’  and appreciate the opportunity to respond to their comments. In our original manuscript , we presented an evaluation of crown fire rate of spread predictions from two physics-based wildland fire behavior models: FIRETEC and the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Dynamics Simulator (WFDS). Our approach, as outlined in our original paper, relied upon using a previously published dataset of real-world crown fires, hereafter referred to as AC06 , and previously published fire rate of spread predictions. Following recommendations for model performance assessment proposed in Rykiel , we examined the proportion of simulated crown fire rates of spread that fell within a 95th percentile prediction interval we developed using the data in AC06. We also provided several discussion points about the challenges associated with evaluating physics-based model performance, potential sources of error/disagreement, and future research needs. Our manuscript built upon an existing body of work and offered insights based on one of many potential approaches that can be used to assess physics-based model performance.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHoffman, C. M.; Ziegler, J.; Linn, R. R.; Canfield, J.; Mell, W.; Sieg, C. H.; Pimont, F. 2019. Reply to Cruz and Alexander: Comments on “Evaluating Crown Fire Rate of Spread Predictions from Physics-Based Models.” Fire Technology. 55: 1927-1929.
Keywordscrown fire rate, spread predictions, models, FIRETEC, Wildland Urban Interface Fire Dynamics Simulator (WFDS)
- Evaluating crown fire rate of spread predictions from physics-based models
- Error associated with model predictions of wildland fire rate of spread
- Examination of WFDS in modeling spreading fires in a furniture calorimeter
XML: View XML