Skip to Main Content
Effects of scale of movement, detection probability, and true population density on common methods of estimating population densityAuthor(s): David A. Keiter; Amy J. Davis; Olin E. Rhodes; Fred L. Cunningham; John C. Kilgo; Kim M. Pepin; James C. Beasley
Source: Scientific Reports
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
Download Publication (5.0 MB)
DescriptionKnowledge of population density is necessary for effective management and conservation of wildlife, yet rarely are estimators compared in their robustness to effects of ecological and observational processes, which can greatly influence accuracy and precision of density estimates. In this study, we simulate biological and observational processes using empirical data to assess effects of animal scale of movement, true population density, and probability of detection on common density estimators. We also apply common data collection and analytical techniques in the field and evaluate their ability to estimate density of a globally widespread species. We find that animal scale of movement had the greatest impact on accuracy of estimators, although all estimators suffered reduced performance when detection probability was low, and we provide recommendations as to when each field and analytical technique is most appropriately employed. The large influence of scale of movement on estimator accuracy emphasizes the importance of effective post-hoc calculation of area sampled or use of methods that implicitly account for spatial variation. In particular, scale of movement impacted estimators substantially, such that area covered and spacing of detectors (e.g. cameras, traps, etc.) must reflect movement characteristics of the focal species to reduce bias in estimates of movement and thus density.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationKeiter, David A.; Davis, Amy J.; Rhodes, Olin E.; Cunningham, Fred L.; Kilgo, John C.; Pepin, Kim M.; Beasley, James C. 2017. Effects of scale of movement, detection probability, and true population density on common methods of estimating population density. Scientific Reports. 7(1): 382-. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09746-5.
- Analysing designed experiments in distance sampling
- A framework for inference about carnivore density from unstructured spatial sampling of scat using detector dogs
- Integrating citizen-science data with movement models to estimate the size of a migratory golden eagle population
XML: View XML