Skip to Main Content
Ecosystem services of poplar at long‐term phytoremediation sites in the Midwest and Southeast, United StatesAuthor(s): Ronald S. Zalesny; William L. Headlee; Gayathri Gopalakrishnan; Edmund O. Bauer; Richard B. Hall; Dennis W. Hazel; Jud G. Isebrands; Louis A. Licht; M. Cristina Negri; Elizabeth Guthrie Nichols; Donald L. Rockwood; Adam H. Wiese
Source: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
Download Publication (3.0 MB)
DescriptionShort rotation woody crops (SRWCs) including Populus species and their hybrids (i.e., poplars) are ideal for incorporating biomass production with phytotechnologies such as phytoremediation. To integrate these applications, 15 poplar plantings from nine long-term phytoremediation installations were sampled from 2012 to 2013 in the Midwest (Illinois, Iowa, Wisconsin) and Southeast (Alabama, Florida, North Carolina) United States. In this review, we report summary results of this sampling and how performance at each site compared with comparable phytoremediation systems in the literature. We review significant genotypic differences from each planting within the context of provisioning (i.e., biomass production) and regulating (i.e., carbon sequestration) ecosystem services and how they relate to the need for a cleaner environment during times of accelerated ecological degradation. Overall, the contaminated poplar sites provided these ecosystem services comparable to noncontaminated poplar sites used for bioenergy and biofuels feedstock production. For example, phytoremediation trees at the Midwestern sites had biomass values ranging from 4.4 to 15.5 Mg ha−1 y−1, which was ~20% less relative to bioenergy trees (p = .0938). Results were similar for diameter and carbon, with some genotype × environment interactions resulting in phytoremediation trees exhibiting substantially greater growth and productivity (i.e., +131% at one site). As illustrated in the current review, phytoremediation success can be increased with the identification and deployment of genotypes tailored to grow well and tolerate a broad diversity of contaminants (generalists) (i.e., 'DN34', 'NM6', '7300501') versus those that significantly outperform their counterparts under unique site conditions (specialists) (i.e., '220-5', '51-5', 'S13C20').
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
CitationZalesny, Ronald S.; Headlee, William L.; Gopalakrishnan, Gayathri; Bauer, Edmund O.; Hall, Richard B.; Hazel, Dennis W.; Isebrands, Jud G.; Licht, Louis A.; Negri, M. Cristina; Nichols, Elizabeth Guthrie; Rockwood, Donald L.; Wiese, Adam H. 2019. Ecosystem services of poplar at long‐term phytoremediation sites in the Midwest and Southeast, United States. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment. 8(6): 346-. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.349.
Keywordsbiomass production, carbon sequestration, phytotechnologies, Populus, short rotation woody crops
- Clonal variation in survival and growth of hybrid poplar and willow in an in situ trial on soils heavily contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons
- Genotypic variability and stability of poplars and willows grown onnitrate-contaminated soils
- An approach for siting poplar energy production systems to increase productivity and associated ecosystem services
XML: View XML