Skip to Main Content
Combining potentially incompatible community datasets when harmonizing forest inventories in subarctic Alaska, USAAuthor(s): Robert J. Smith; Andrew N. Gray
Source: Journal of Vegetation Science. 30(1): 18-29.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
View PDF (4.0 MB)
DescriptionAims: Plant responses to disturbances and environmental variation can manifest in communities as compositional nestedness (i.e., one community is a subset of another) and/or turnover (two communities represent different compositional gradient spaces). Yet, different sampling designs can artificially give an illusion of such compositional differences among two datasets, making it problematic to harmonize them in multi-species analysis. We test the prediction that sampling differences which increase beta- diversity components (nestedness and turnover) among two vegetation datasets will decrease their exchangeability.
Location: Boreal forests of Tanana River region, interior Alaska, USA.
Methods: We develop novel methods for comparing compositional variation among two datasets in nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination. Resampled NMDS establishes internal sampling variability for each dataset independently, and reciprocal NMDS determines external exchangeability when the two are mutually exchanged. We first compare simulated data with specified beta-diversity differences, then evaluate two forest inventories based on local vs regional sampling designs in Alaska’s boreal forests.
Results: As simulated species turnover and nestedness increased, internal sampling variability remained essentially constant, but external exchangeability progressively declined. Species turnover (not nestedness) had the larger negative effect on exchangeability. Among the boreal forest inventories, internal sampling variability was relatively similar, and exchangeability was weakly moderate, but the regional inventory exhibited much better fit to broad-scale environment. Species turnover (not nestedness) contributed the majority of beta-diversity differences among the two forest inventories, suggesting that strong environmental gradients were unequally represented.
Conclusions: Species turnover alters multivariate outcomes more drastically than species nestedness. Therefore, combining two vegetation datasets may be inadvisable when turnover prevails. Instead, a multi-scale perspective, with separate but complementary forest inventory analyses, can portray local and regional variation at appropriate scales. Our method is tractable for assessing exchangeability of potentially inconsistent sampling designs, like those that are common in synthesis studies and long-term ecological monitoring.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationSmith, Robert J.; Gray, Andrew N. 2019. Combining potentially incompatible community datasets when harmonizing forest inventories in subarctic Alaska, USA. Journal of Vegetation Science. 30(1): 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12694.
KeywordsBeta-diversity, bootstrapped ordination, boreal forests, community compositions, cross validation, forest ecology, interior Alaska, national forest inventory, nonmetric multidimensional scaling, procrustes analysis, species abundance distributions, species pools.
- Stability and structure in [alpha]- and [beta]-keggin heteropolytungstates, [Xn+W12O40](8-n)-, X = p-block cation
- Methods for estimating aboveground biomass and its components for Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine trees
- Historical agriculture alters the effects of fire on understory plant beta diversity
XML: View XML