Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub

    Description

    A type of blocked experiment has the potential of being poorly designed and analyzed. Several papers by Verrill and co-workers referred to such an experiment as a “predictor sort” experiment. It has also been referred to in other papers and textbooks as “artificial pairing” and “matched pair” or “matched subjects” design. The associated design process is also sometimes described as “forming blocks via a concomitant variable.” In a wood research context, the response in such an experiment might be lumber strength after a treatment, and the predictor used to form blocks would be some combination of lumber stiffness, knot size, and slope of grain (all of which can be measured nondestructively prior to specimen allocation). Improperly designed or analyzed, predictor sort experiments can be associated with incorrect power calculations, inappropriate sample sizes, incorrect tests of hypotheses, and incorrect confidence intervals. In a 2017 paper, Verrill and Kretschmann reviewed the main results in the literature, added a section on multiple comparisons, and presented the results from power and confidence interval coverage simulations that emphasized the importance of proper design and analysis of predictor sort experiments; that work was based on the assumption that the predictor and the response have a bivariate normal distribution. This paper, which can be thought of as a companion to the 2017 paper, constitutes a nontheoretical, simulation-based first look at the effect of predictor sort allocation on nonparametric hypothesis tests (Kruskal–Wallis, one-way on ranks, oneway on Van der Waerden ranks, two-way on ranks, and Friedman tests) and nonparametric confidence bounds on quantiles. It also considers situations in which a bivariate normal assumption for the predictor–response pair does not hold.

    Publication Notes

    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Verrill, Steve P.; Kretschmann, David E. 2019. Simulations of nonparametric analyses of predictor sort (matched specimens) data. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-699. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: 1-83.

    Keywords

    Predictor sort sampling, artificial pairing, matched pairs, matched subjects, concomitant variable, blocked ANOVA, analysis of covariance, nonparametrics, confidence bounds on quantiles

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/58505